2018-09-29 10:18 GMT+02:00, John Pilkington <johnpilk222(a)gmail.com>:
On 29/09/18 08:55, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 15:46 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>> On 9/28/18 3:13 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 11:48 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I just upgraded one of my machines to FC29 Beta. Looks
>>>> pretty. Haven't had a chance to play with it yet.
>>>>
>>>> -T
>>>>
>>>> Here are my upgrade notes;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FC 28 -->> FC 29:
>>>>
>>>> # rpm --rebuilddb
>>>> # rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>>>> if anything is too new, do a
>>>> # dnf downgrade offender(s)
>>>>
>>>> # dnf --enablerepo=* update --refresh
>>>> # dnf install python3-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
>>>> # dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=29 --allowerasing
>>>> --best
>>>> # dnf clean packages <-- optional
>>>> # dnf system-upgrade reboot
>>>
>>> Wrong list. The Fedora Test list is the appropriate place.
>>>
>>> poc
>>
>> Are you sure? I was just giving general information to the
>> community as a whole. I haven't tested anything yet
>
> F29 is not released. The guidelines for the User list state that it's
> for discussion of the released version of Fedora (currently 28 and 27).
> If you have comments on the future version the Test list is the place
> to post them. Many people on the Test list do not read the User list
> and won't see your comments, and cross-posting to multiple lists is
> frowned on.
>
> poc
I think this is too restrictive, The procedures quoted are for users of
FC28.
... who want to test the not yet released F29, and for whom there is
the Test list.
But anyway, you are free to create a fedora list with less stringent
restrictions on what counts as on topic.
Andras