On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 22:11 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
Is there a movement to get rid of xinetd? It's just that I
remember
that the trend used to be to move more server processes to be added to
the inetd config.
As I recall, the trend was to move away from it, with individual scripts
per service rather than an all encompassing inetd.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.23-78.2.50.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.