Mike Burger wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:23 -0700
> Aldo Foot wrote:
>
>
>> I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more
>> manageable in the surface.
>>
>
> A friend at work who uses it says it is vastly easier to
> do things like pass USB devices through to the virtual hardware
> with VirtualBox than with anything else he has tried,
> so he can do things like use Windows scanner software for
> scanners not supported by anything in linux.
>
>
I have to agree...at this point, I simply installed the VirtualBox RPM,
ran the setup, started up VirtualBox, and voila!!!
I have stuck with VB (after trying kvm) because the interface (mouse, video)
on VB work much better. Using kvm (through qemu) lacks a lot in terms of
interface.