From: "Rahul Sundaram" <sundaram(a)redhat.com>
Kam Leo wrote:
>On 12/29/05, Dave Stevens <geek(a)uniserve.com> wrote:
>
>
>>and there's
fedorafaq.org. not comprehensive but pretty good and as far as I
>>know everything there is accurate, easy to read, etc.
>>
>>d
>>
>>
>>
>
>The problem with all these
fedora*.org sites is that some are and some
>are not officially affiliated with the main
htttp://fedora.redhat.com
>site. The fedora marketing droids need to really get the "fedora"
>branding straightened out. There are too many of these "fedora*.org"
>sites popping up and the ones officially affiliated are not tightly
>coupled to the main site.
>
>
The only official ones are
http://fedora.redhat.com and
http://fedoraproject.org as listed in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites and they are pretty well coupled
together. Rest of the community websites are listed in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CommunityWebsites and managing them is not
really a function of "fedora marketing droids".
Gee, and here I thought he was volunteering to be a Fedora Marketing
Droid, one each, prepackaged and delivered. Last I knew Fedora was not
"marketed" at all by RedHat. It's their beta test group.
{o.o}