On 19 January 2012 22:09, g <geleem(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
On 01/19/2012 12:56 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 03:52 +0000, g wrote:
> but the (obvious) spam (simply by looking at the list of
recipients)
this is true. because it was sent to a 'tsl' also.
viewing "source", "header" can be read, but not
able to read "body"
because of 'base64'.
to view "body", opened as 'email'. saw link. thought. what the heck.
possible a subscriber messed up. wondered what. clicked link.
using firefox and NoScript, running firewall, rkhunter,
backed up. why not.
firefox displayed a "404". i broke link.
Don't know why you conclude that, spam links can have a short lifetime
as they get shut down.
FWIW I do agree base64 is an unfriendly way to send email text bodies.
--
imalone