Rick Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 19:11 +0100, Adalbert Prokop wrote:
> Tim Alberts wrote on Tuesday 30 October 2007:
>
>> It's certainly not selfish if you want run production servers...it just
>> prompts the question (yet again), 'is Fedora production quality or just
>> beta test for Redhat?'
> You question implies there are only those two options available, which
> might not be true. In this case your question would be inane.
>
> I would neither assume Fedora being RedHat's *beta* playing ground nor
> would I use it for a server, which I *must* rely on.
> I use it as my workstation OS and for my home server - I think that was
> the goal of Fedora and it does it job fair enough.
Actually, Fedora _is_ the beta stuff for RHEL. There is no RHEL beta
stuff...it's either RHEL or it's Fedora. Example: RHEL5 is essentially
Fedora Core 6.
RHEL does have betas, go look at the list of mailing lists.
Of course, I look more at it as a "technology preview" rather than beta,
but I'm weird.
As you wish. Essentially, Fedora users are part of the test and
evaluation program.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa(a)coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa(a)coco.merseine.nu
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
Please do not reply off-list