You have zero basis for such assumptions and even if that
is the case,
licensing conflicts will always triumph code quality
consideration since
if a code cannot be included, there is no point in talking
about how
stable or buggy it is.
It is Fedora's legal position
that cdrkit has a
licensing issue.
It has a licensing issue? I thought it was included because the original was the one that
had the issue? or did you make a mistake here?
It is the same position
held by all other major
distributions as well.
--
Slackware is a major distribution. It includes original cdrtools :)
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html
Slackware
Slackware ships the original cdrtools and does not even ship the broken fork.
I also use it and it comes with the original, there's a slackbuild from Patrick V..
So others like source based distros also have it. Nobody has sued them.
I have built packages for slax-remix & porteus using the slackbuild without problems.
Regards,
Antonio