On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 06:39 -0500, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
Simon Slater wrote:
> Thanks Matt. I saw dnsmasq mentioned in one how-to but didn't chase it
> since I was focussing on DHCP and bind.
DHCP is a protocol and bind is an implementation (of DNS, mainly).
You're comparing apples to orchardists.
These are the types of distinctions I need to get clear.
Now there are half a dozen
> boxes, but will increase to 2 dozen over the next year. Is this still
> within the scope of dnsmasq?
I believe so.
> Realising there are a variety of solutions, I don't want
> to come against Ockham's Razor.
Right, I think dnsmasq is simple but will get your job done.
Matt Flaschen
I'll read up on it tomorrow.
--
Regards,
Simon Slater
Registered Linux User #463789. Be counted at:
http://counter.li.org/