Torsdag 04 november 2004 19:40 skrev Dag Wieers:
Let me add to this that the incompatability of the 3rd party
repositories
has nothing to do with the inability or unwillingness of the 3rd party
packagers (to the contrary). But the unwillingness (and policy) of
fedora.us to not allow for compatibility. Apparently it is too hard to
work with the community.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
That is really interesting. I use
rpm
http://apt.sw.be fedora/2/en/i386 dag
from your repository
rpm
http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/2/i386 core updates freshrpms
from freshrpms
and
rpm
ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ fedora/2 stable
rpm
ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ fedora/all stable
rpm
ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ kde-redhat/2 stable
rpm
ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ kde-redhat/all stable
from kde-redhat. Unitl recently I had no problems, but the last couple of days
a little bit. I have normally gotten mplayer from freshrpms, but recently
there was an upgrade from your repository. Is that problem free
Erik