Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2019-12-10 18:31, Dario Lesca wrote:
> A curiosity:
>
> Why the samba mit/heimdal kerberos is not managed as it
> is done for many other projects in which the packages are
> divided into more sub-packages, like for example
> dovecot-mysql/dovecot-pgsql or samba-vfs-glusterfs /r
> samba-vfs-cephfs, ecc..
I do not know the answer to that since I'm not familiar
with the actual packages/packaging.
That appears to me to have been covered in the thread Dario
started on the devel list last month:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
It seemed clear to me that the Samba maintainers in Fedora
are well-aware of the situation and felt strongly that
pushing forward to improve the MIT kerberos support in Samba
was the only reasonable path for the distribution to take.
So it doesn't seem surprising that they do not build and
support Samba with Heimdal kerberos.
--
Todd