> So you measure the quality of the programs with SELinux. Ouch.
I certainly put bad marks against programs which do unwise things
Unwise according to SELinux -- another program.
> Linux is not Microsoft Windows.
Though some programmers seem to think that it should be. Some
users, too.
heh. To me it looks like many fedora users are so much traumatized by
Windows insecurity that they brought the same habits into computing on
Linux which are not necessary -- like fearing HTML mail or feeling
vulnerable without firewall or other security enhancing softwares...
> No SELinux does not mean no restriction or no security.
I never said it. But when you see something trying to read something
that it shouldn't, that was stopped by SELinux, it's a window into the
mindset of the program author.
Care to give an example? Which program tries to read which file?