John Summerfied wrote:
Kam Leo wrote:
> On 12/29/05, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Kam Leo wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 12/29/05, Dave Stevens <geek(a)uniserve.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> and there's
fedorafaq.org. not comprehensive but pretty good and as
>>>> far as I
>>>> know everything there is accurate, easy to read, etc.
>>>>
>>>> d
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The problem with all these
fedora*.org sites is that some are and some
>>> are not officially affiliated with the main
htttp://fedora.redhat.com
>>> site. The fedora marketing droids need to really get the "fedora"
>>> branding straightened out. There are too many of these
"fedora*.org"
>>> sites popping up and the ones officially affiliated are not tightly
>>> coupled to the main site.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The only official ones are
http://fedora.redhat.com and
>>
http://fedoraproject.org as listed in
>>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites and they are pretty well coupled
>> together. Rest of the community websites are listed in
for some reason I thought
fedoralegacy.org was official.
Official in what sense? It is not sponsored by Red Hat Co.
[snip]
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!