On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:02:40 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/3/20 11:59 AM, Beartooth wrote:
> IF (big if) I understand aright, the answer is that there are
> various colors in command output, such as ls making folders differ from
> files; all are fine except one.
>
> That one is the color dnf upgrade uses to list what it proposes to
> change. (What it reports while making the changes is fine.) At present
> it shows bright chartreuse on pale blue -- which just fuzzes out.
If the only problem is the one color from dnf, then either disable dnf
colors or use the information from the last thread to adjust the color
that's causing the problem.
I found /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS, /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS.256color, and
/etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS.lightbgcolor.
In the first one, I found among much else
"# If you use DOS-style suffixes, you may want to uncomment the following:
#.cmd 01;32 # executables (bright green)" I changed 32 to 31; removed
both hashmarks; no joy; rebooted; still no joy.
Am I editing the wrong file? That comment about suffixes doesn't
quite sit right, but I didn't see anything else that looked likelier.
--
Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is.