On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 19:11 +0100, Adalbert Prokop wrote:
Tim Alberts wrote on Tuesday 30 October 2007:
> It's certainly not selfish if you want run production servers...it just
> prompts the question (yet again), 'is Fedora production quality or just
> beta test for Redhat?'
You question implies there are only those two options available, which
might not be true. In this case your question would be inane.
I would neither assume Fedora being RedHat's *beta* playing ground nor
would I use it for a server, which I *must* rely on.
I use it as my workstation OS and for my home server - I think that was
the goal of Fedora and it does it job fair enough.
Actually, Fedora _is_ the beta stuff for RHEL. There is no RHEL beta
stuff...it's either RHEL or it's Fedora. Example: RHEL5 is essentially
Fedora Core 6.
Of course, I look more at it as a "technology preview" rather than beta,
but I'm weird.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Principal Engineer rstevens(a)internap.com -
- CDN Systems, Internap, Inc.
http://www.internap.com -
- -
- Admitting you have a problem is the first step toward getting -
- medicated for it. -- Jim Evarts (
http://www.TopFive.com) -
----------------------------------------------------------------------