On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 21:18 +0100, Bernd Radinger wrote:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:23:09 -0600, Jeff Vian
<jvian10(a)charter.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 08:12 +0100, Bernd Radinger wrote:
>
>
> > On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 20:41:10 -0600, Jeff Vian <jvian10(a)charter.net>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. It tried to remove libaasound.so.2 and libFLAC.so.4 plus one
other I
> > > > > don't remember. All of which were required for one or more
packages
> > > > > already installed
> > > >
> > > > 'flac' and 'alsa-lib' are from FC, not Fedora.us.
> > > Exactly.. Packages from FC were being modified by an update from
> > > fedora.us
> >
> > No package at Fedora.us modifies flac or alsa-lib or causes it to be
> > removed. None of the packages ``updates'' FC. By definition,
> > Fedora.Extras are not permitted to update FC. Again, your theory is
> > void..., FUD as Dag Wieers put it. Fact the facts or prove otherwise.
> >
> Dag did not call it FUD, That was Michael.
GMail search only lists Dag. It is only his messages in which to find
the word ``FUD''. Latest quote from this thread: ``BTW if people
encounter problems with packages, they should report them. I'm sure
Axel's packages do not fail on fc3 and implying so without
verification is indeed FUD.'' Whether Axel or another repository, this
is exactly what applies to you.
<snip>
> >
> I understand it exactly, and my experience provided a stark example of
> that.
No example, no session log, no bugzilla, just FUD.
--
Bernd ``who's getting bored of Jeff and who thinks installing
additional software on FC is still too hard if you are supposed to
search for software in unknown places'' R.
Bernd,
Sorry to disillusion you, but this is the text of the message sent to me
by Michael Schwendt on 11/30
Jeff,
after a second person forwarded this to me, I feel the need to reply
to your FUD:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jeff Vian <jvian10(a)charter.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:26:44 -0600
Subject: Re: Fedora Extras is extra
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
<snip>
trying to remove some libraries that were required by installed
packages. I removed fedora.us from my list of repositories and the
update went flawlessly after that.
I don't believe you. No package at fedora.us upgrades or downgrades
any packages from Fedora Core. No package at fedora.us provides or
obsoletes anything included within Fedora Core. All add-ons depend on
Fedora Core.
And of course, you have not kept any session log.
Michael