On Tuesday March 25 2008 9:57:29 am Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Claude Jones
<cjones(a)levitjames.com> wrote:
> On Tue March 25 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:49 PM, David Kramer
<david(a)thekramers.net> wrote:
> > > Also, I got disgusted with the fights between livna
> > > and atrpms a long time ago, and now I don't have a
> > > single livna package on my system.
> >
> > There in lies your problem. Always go with Livna.
>
> why? sorry, but this kind of statement always irritates me
> --
It also irritates me when people argue against a statement of
mine in a way tangential to my statement: he was choosing
between Livna and Atrpms. You entire rebuttal was about
freshrpms. But to respond to you, Livna an FreshRPMs work
relatively close, and I two of the repos looking to merge
together.
Both personal experience and experience helping others say
prioritize Livna over Atrpms. Atrpms does provide some unique
packages however.
fair enough - I took your Livna comment out of context - it's
something that's oft stated here and I just made a bad
assumption
--
Claude Jones
Brunswick, MD, USA