On 05/29/2010 08:56 AM, David Boles wrote:
On 5/28/2010 8:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/29/2010 07:56 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
>> On Friday 28 May 2010 04:22 PM, David Boles wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Bittorent sucks. Period.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I am replying just to disagree with this part of your email.
>>
>>
>>
>>> A question. Bittorent exists because you are supposed to SHARE. Did YOU?
>>> share?
>>>
>>> One down byte / and one up byte is the standard. Did you upload at least
>>> as much as you downloaded? REAL men double up. Means? Share up twice
>>> what you downloaded. Did you?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Yes I did, my share ratio is somewhere between 2 and 3. So far I have
>> downloaded the XFCE LiveCD, but I was planning to download the DVD even
>> though I don't need it. Do you know why? Just so that I can seed. Yes
>> people do share. I don't know if you have read all the messages in this
>> thread, but there was a poster who shared his DVD download for F12 to a
>> share ratio of 400 over the last 6 months!
>>
>> Bittorrent rulez.
>>
>>
>>
> I also agree with you. I generally keep my bittorrent client running
> most of the time. I love that I can share and I love it that I can
> control upload/download speeds to have minimal effect on, for example,
> watching baseball games.
>
That makes two. You also deserve congratulations for doing your part.
That makes you part 'two' for two.
No, that simply makes me one of two that have chosen to reply. You have
no way to measure or conclude how many others are doing the same.
--
I attribute my success to intelligence, guts, determination, honesty,
ambition, and having enough money to buy people with those qualities. 葛
斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段