Kam Leo wrote:
>On 12/29/05, Dave Stevens <geek(a)uniserve.com> wrote:
>>and there's fedorafaq.org
. not comprehensive but pretty good and as far as I
>>know everything there is accurate, easy to read, etc.
>The problem with all these fedora*.org
sites is that some are and some
>are not officially affiliated with the main htttp://fedora.redhat.com
>site. The fedora marketing droids need to really get the "fedora"
>branding straightened out. There are too many of these "fedora*.org"
>sites popping up and the ones officially affiliated are not tightly
>coupled to the main site.
The only official ones are http://fedora.redhat.com
as listed in
and they are pretty well coupled
together. Rest of the community websites are listed in
and managing them is not
really a function of "fedora marketing droids".
Isn't "Fedora" trademarked? So shouldn't the marketing droids set the
legal beagles upon the unofficial sites?