IMHO it would be most likely caused by this change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SunRPCRemoval
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko(a)greshko.com> wrote:
On 06/18/18 22:13, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Upgraded a system from fedora 27 to fedora 28, and went to rebuild
> busybox, and it fails with 3 header files missing?
And you don't think telling the list what header files are being reported
as missing
is a bad idea?
>
> With Fedora 27 the directory contains a number of header files, but with
> fedora 28 it only contains netdb.h??
>
> Fedora 27 shows glibc-headers as being the patchage that provides them,
> and Fedora 28 has the package install, but a search on it results with
no files
> that provides the missing files.
>
> Reinstalled the package, but still only the one netdb.h file?
>
> Tried copying the missing files from Fedora 27 to the directory, and it
gets
> thru the compile process with them, but then gets errors during the link
> process, since the libraries must be missing something?
>
Again, your decision to not name the "missing" files would seem ill
advised.
--
Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't
a fact.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.
fedoraproject.org/message/7IZLYUTLJN3FZ5ICF6PG5QTZZRBVLJXW/