On 21 Sep 2023 at 16:23, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
From: Zdenek Pytela zpytela@redhat.com Date sent: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:23:01 +0200 Subject: Re: Noticed Failed message with selinux-policy-targeted on 3 of 5 machines?? To: mikes@guam.net Copies to: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:    Zdenek Pytela <<a href="mailto:zpytela@redhat.com" target="_blank">zpytela@redhat.com</a>><br> Subject:         Re: Noticed Failed message with selinux-policy-targeted on 3 of 5 machines??<br> To:      <a href="mailto:mikes@guam.net" target="_blank">mikes@guam.net</a>,<br>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:28 AM Michael D. Setzer II mikes@guam.net wrote: On 20 Sep 2023 at 19:57, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
From: Zdenek Pytela zpytela@redhat.com Date sent: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:57:31 +0200 Subject: Re: Noticed Failed message with selinux-policy-targeted on 3 of 5 machines?? To: mikes@guam.net, Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 8:25 AM Michael D. Setzer II via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: In running dnf update on 5 machines noticed a fail message on 3 or
5?
To double check ran dnf reinstall selinux* and get this on failing systems?
Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Running scriptlet: selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/1 Running scriptlet: selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/1 Preparing : 1/1 Reinstalling : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8 Reinstalling : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8 Reinstalling : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8 Failed to resolve allow statement at /var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/200/container/cil:1186 Failed to resolve AST /usr/sbin/semodule: Failed!
Reinstalling : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8 Cleanup : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 5/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8 Cleanup : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8 Cleanup : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8 Cleanup : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8 Running scriptlet : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 1/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 2/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 3/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 4/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 5/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 6/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 7/8 Verifying : selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch 8/8
Reinstalled: selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch
Complete!
Other day get a message about about regex version not matching,
and
was told to reintall container-selinux. That doesn't seem to fix issue. Did find changing to minimum option gets rid of the regex message? But why 2 of the machines seem to have no problem, but other 3 get same message? Michael,
The update restults may depend on other components or if some customizations are in place. What version is container-selinux?
rpm -qa "selinux-policy*" "*-selinux"
rpm -qa | grep selinux-policy selinux-policy-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-minimum-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-devel-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-doc-38.28-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-38.28-1.fc38.noarch I wanted to see other packages, too. Maybe also
semodule -lfull | grep -v ^100
Noticed one machine that gets failed didn't have selinux-policy-doc installed and installed it, then tried reinstalling all the selinux-policy and still got error? Failed to resolve allow statement at /var/lib/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/200/container/cil:1186 Failed to resolve AST /usr/sbin/semodule: Failed! Files in that directory are -rw-------. 1 root root 2 Sep 21 08:09 lang_ext -rw-------. 1 root root 24411 Sep 21 08:09 hll -rw-------. 1 root root 13487 Sep 21 08:09 cil
The cil file is a binary file, so not sure what :1186 means? that tmp directory doesn't exist on my notebook that doesn't have error? It's a temporary directory used for the policy rebuild. Try this:
f39# file /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil: bzip2 compressed data, block size = 500k f39# file -z /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil: ASCII text, with very long lines (446) (bzip2 compressed data, block size = 500k) f39# bunzip2 </var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/container/cil | sed -n '1180,1187p'
What's in the output?
(allow container_runtime_domain spc_t (netlink_crypto_socket (relabelfrom relabelto))) (allow container_runtime_domain spc_t (sctp_socket (relabelfrom relabelto))) (allow container_runtime_domain spc_t (icmp_socket (relabelfrom relabelto))) (allow container_runtime_domain spc_t (ax25_socket (relabelfrom relabelto))) (allow container_runtime_domain spc_t (ipx_socket (relabelfrom relabelto))) (allow container_runtime_domain spc_t (netrom_socket (relabelfrom relabelto))) (allow container_runtime_domain spc_t (bridge_socket (relabelfrom relabelto))) (allow container_runtime_domain spc_t (atmpvc_socket (relabelfrom relabelto)))
set selinux to minimal on machines. Don't understand this.
/usr/bin/python3 -Es /usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py Under Status set to Permissive, Permissive, Minimum since Targeted was showing failed message.
I cannot reproduce your problem using any updating path with the
latest
package versions.
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.or
g Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Zdenek Pytela Security SELinux team
+------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mikes@guam.net mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +------------------------------------------------------------+
--
Zdenek Pytela Security SELinux team
+------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mikes@guam.net mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +------------------------------------------------------------+