On Mar 24, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:56:13PM +0100, lee wrote:
>
> There`s nothing weird or exotic about it. I`ve always had /usr on its
> own partition until the F17 installer refused that, which it shouldn`t
> have.
I'm sorry but the installer denying /usr on its own partition on F17 is
the right thing to do. I believe F17 introduced something called
usr-move, meaning all the binaries in /bin /sbin are actually
hardlinks/symlinks to /usr/bin and /usr/sbin. I believe this was a
multi-distribution effort. In such a configuration, there is no
justification or gain of putting it in a separate partition, on top of
that the booting process becomes quite complicated.
That's all correct.
Chris Murphy