On 01/30/2010 07:03 PM, Mikkel wrote:
On 01/30/2010 06:25 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> Q? This code uses the 'sleep(1)' call to time its repeat scans. It is using
> no cpu as its the bottom item on an htop sorted by use report.
>
> I assume I can go into the tarball and change those 2 sleep calls to
> sleep(0.05) to get 20 scans a second? I'm going to try it anyway & see if it
> will still build.
>
Nope - sleep only accepts an integer value. Using sleep, 1 second it
the best you will get.
Mikkel
He probably wants usleep() which sleeps for microsecond intervals.
--
Rod