On 10-03-02 22:43:13, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 18:20:37 -0800,
Don Quixote de la Mancha <quixote(a)dulcineatech.com> wrote:
>
> If the only problem was that some sectors got remapped, it
> shouldn't be failing any of the tests. At worst, it would simply
> report that the remapping had taken place, but that the test had
> passed.
If you have pending reallocations you can get errors on the surface
scans. And one often needs to write a block to allow for
reallocation to occur, so these can sit around for a while.
Palimpsest is worse than that. It claims a disk that has any
*reallocated* sectors is bad.
--
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@georgeanelson.com>
' <
http://www.georgeanelson.com/>