Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> writes:
Am 17.06.2013 04:29, schrieb lee:
> You're missing the point which was someones assumption that a particular
> component must be useless because it can be spf. I was merely asking if
> there's also the assumption that ppl go to all the considerable lengths
> required to avoid spfs (so that the components they are using aren't
> useless).
>
> Don't try to hold me responsible for other ppls logic, flawed or not
it was *your* argumentation that *you* can not pull your disks
in a different machine because there is only one controller
on earth which can read your disks
I haven't said that anywhere.
- this is usually *not* true for others because they have spare
controllers or not using hardware RAID and if *you* do not need
mcelog.service disable it and stop your uselles discussion why *you*
can not read logfiles if your system does not boot, others can
Why don't you just stop claiming I said things I didn't say? Are you
doing this so you have something to get upset about?
hence in professional environment you even use the --syslog
option and have logs on different machines where you can
read them even if the machine including disks and controller
is dead
You can always do that if you have several computers at hand to direct
log outputs to. What's your argument here? That I should get some more
computers so that I can always read what mcelog might have to say? I'd
have to disappoint you because I don't plan on running some kind of
server farm just for that.
--
"Object-oriented programming languages aren't completely convinced that
you should be allowed to do anything with functions."
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/08/01.html