On Wed, 2005-13-07 at 02:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
>
>We all read :
>
>
speak for yourself
>No need to respond, we have heard the same BS so many times.
>Don't respond unless you are going to help!
>
>
>
Avoid pre implications
I have watched you steam rolling people for a long time, in case
you didn't know 'pre' indicates something 'in advance of' which
comes for the latin root 'ad' which means 'toward'. Somthing
that comes 'afterwards' uses the term 'post', and since I was
indicated prior actions as being the cause of the dismissal
your comment makes little sense. If you meant that, in order to
comply we would not have to read your insults and magniloquent
suggestions, then by all means please comply.
regards
Rahul