On 11/01/2010 06:24 PM, g wrote:
On 11/01/2010 04:23 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
<snip>
> I can't sleep ....
>
i know the feeling. but i did get some sleep. using melatonin. ;)
> I use for example the following repositories:
>
http://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/updates/12/i386/repodata/
>
http://fedora.mirror.iweb.ca/updates/12/i386/repodata/
>
see below.
> BTW, your repository:
>
http://mirrors.vexs.net/pub/fedora/linux/updates/12/i386/repodata/
>
> is out of date, so the checksums are completely different,
>
yes, there are out of date. seeing '2010-Oct-08 21:07:45' did not appear
that would be older than what you had.
> The checksums of the archive and of the file in are correct in my case as
> well, despite this fact the yum complains.
>
ok. this was misleading;
>> It is a problem of update repository and any cleaning doesn't help. I
>> compared the checksum of my local file and checksum of the same file
>> downloaded from several mirrors and I got the same values.
>>
i took it to mean sha1sum was failing also.
> If I delete /var/cache/yum/* and update the system, yum complain that the
> file pkgtags.sqlite.gz is missing. But everything works and if I use
> PackageKit, nothing is noticeable.
>
> Ok, it looks again I might fall asleep ....
>
ok.
i am currently running in scientific linux and i have not updated fedora 12
in 2 weeks, because of some deps problems i ran into.
You have the similar way of thinking. I have a local Fedora's repository
synchronized using rsync and waiting for SL6. Now I am tempted to
install SL6 Pre-Alpha.
i have to go out and take care of some personal business. when i
return, i
will boot fedora 12 to see if my deps clear up and have a look at what i
have in /var/cache/yum/*.
hopefully someone can reply with something helpful while i am gone.
much luck.