On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 12:08:28PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Chris G wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:12:14AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > /srv
> >
> .... and how does that help? It just adds yet *another* possibility!
>
> It makes it easy to keep separate and to back it up I suppose but
> doesn't address the ease of editing or permissions issues.
>
> Is it what /srv is intended for?
yup.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBY...
Yes, I just found my way there too and /srv does seem to be the 'most
correct' place for web pages and other related things. It does seem
that it's far from a well defined standard yet though which would
account for the many different directories used by different
distributions.
Thanks for the pointer.
--
Chris Green