On 06/30/2015 07:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/30/15 19:31, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 06/29/2015 01:45 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
>> [Sorry for the late answer, I was away from this machine.]
>>
>> 2015-06-28 1:01 GMT+02:00, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko(a)greshko.com>:
>>> On 06/27/15 21:15, Andras Simon wrote:
>>>> 2015-06-27 15:11 GMT+02:00, Andras Simon <szajmi(a)gmail.com>:
>>>>> Should I be worried about the $subject?
>>>> And there's also a "SELinux is preventing sh from execute access
on
>>>> the file /usr/sbin/ldconfig" which I've only just noticed. It
sounds
>>>> even scarier.
>>>>
>>> Does your output match these?
>>>
>>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ls -Z /bin/bash
>>> system_u:object_r:shell_exec_t:s0 /bin/bash
>>>
>>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ls -Z /usr/sbin/ldconfig
>>> system_u:object_r:ldconfig_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/ldconfig
>> Yes, I get the same result.
>>
>> Andras
> Everything seems correct.
>
> But the AVC's indicate that firewalld was attempting to runldconfig...
>
> Which I believe should not happen normally. The transactions at the
> time of yum/rpm indicate
> that the transaction or at least the post install sections were being
> run as firewalld_t.
Should that be BZ's to against firewalld?
Sure we should have this in a bugzilla, but not sure those guys will
figure it out either.