On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:36:33PM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 06:23:16AM -0700, George Garvey wrote:
> However, I expect that cups will now fail on a fresh
> installation, unless the user explicitly edits cupsd.conf and puts a
> <Location /> section in. I did not test this theory. I do have a couple
> more systems to install in the next couple of days, and I'll use this RPM
> instead of the one that comes with FC2 and see what happens.
Yes please. I think that it should be alright though -- the cups
package comes with a cupsd.conf that ought to work as is.
You're right. I was wrong.
The installations had no local printer, just FYI. Not that it affects
anything you said.