F23 weird auth problems
by Shawn Badger
I just updated my work desktop to F23 from F22. Everything looked good but
then I realized some of the shares are not mapping. They are CIFS shares
and all common to a single EMC filer. The weird part is that I have a share
mounted on a different EMC filer that is working fine from my fstab file.
If I try to mount the same share from Thunar file manager it works just
fine but from the command line I get:
[root@1GYX8Y1L ####]# mount /home/user/shares/t
Retrying with upper case share name
mount error(13): Permission denied
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
[root@1GYX8Y1L ####r]# mount --verbose -t cifs -o
username=#####,password=#########,domain=######,file_mode=0644,dir_mode=0755,uid=1000,gid=1000
//#####/apps1/ /home/######/shares/w
mount.cifs kernel mount options:
ip=10.1.23.15,unc=\\######\apps1,file_mode=0644,dir_mode=0755,uid=1000,gid=1000,user=######,,domain=#####,pass=********
mount error(13): Permission denied
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
I looked at it with wireshark and I am passing the same username to the
systems but there is way more data being sent betrween the system using
Thunar.
On a side not and not sure it is related but Lotus Notes is also showing
some weird issues (outside the normal ones) where I can get into my mail
but when I try to send I get a "You are not authorized to perform that
operation" and then the path to my mailbox on the server. Possibly
unrelated to the CIFS issue butn ot really sure.
Has anyone else seen this or know a change that may have affected it? I
have already downgrade the cifs-utils package back to F22 with change.
8 years, 4 months
unetbootin
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
Unetbootin fails on fedora 22:
X Error: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied) 10
Extension: 130 (MIT-SHM)
Minor opcode: 1 (X_ShmAttach)
Resource id: 0x12e
X Error: BadShmSeg (invalid shared segment parameter) 128
Extension: 130 (MIT-SHM)
Minor opcode: 5 (X_ShmCreatePixmap)
Resource id: 0x95
X Error: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter) 9
Major opcode: 62 (X_CopyArea)
Resource id: 0x1e00010
X Error: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter) 9
Major opcode: 62 (X_CopyArea)
Resource id: 0x1e00010
X Error: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter) 9
Major opcode: 62 (X_CopyArea)
Resource id: 0x1e00010
waht are the alternatives ?
thank
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
8 years, 4 months
burner
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
How do I get information about a burner ?
+rw
-rw
?
Thank
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
8 years, 4 months
Device Notifier Problem
by tJohn Rosich
This was inadverently sent to the wrong e-mail address. Sorry.
I tried to mount cds and usb sticks (both under gui and cli) I get a
message to the effect that the device wasn't available. How do I
correct this?
The system runs under 86_64 which has been fully updated.
e
TIA
John -
8 years, 4 months
using an OS tree to do remote install fails
by dcw
I have been using the following with no problems:
url --url http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/22/Everything/i386/os/
However, One computer I need to upgrade is in another city and in an
area that has power outages on occasion but It has battery backup.
During a netinstall, if the power goes out while downloading the
packages -- that would require me to go to the location. So I am trying
to use a local OS tree for the install. This will reduce the risk from
power outage.
The documentation says the following:
|harddrive|
Install from a tree or full installation ISO image on a local hard
drive. The tree or ISO image must be on a file system which is
mountable in the installation environment. Supported file systems
are |ext2|, |ext3|, |ext4|, |vfat|, or |xfs|.
|install| |harddrive --partition= | --biospart= [--dir=]|
|--partition=|
Partition to install from (such as |sdb2|).
|--biospart=|
BIOS partition to install from (such as |82p2|).
|--dir=|
Directory containing the installation tree or ISO image.
I only have one drive in the computer: /dev/sda.
When I use:
|harddrive --partition=/dev/sda2 --dir=/path/os|
The target mount points are:
sda1 is mounted as /
sda2 is mounted as /home
The errors are that the drive is not found for install and os tree also
fails.
I also tried:
|harddrive --partition=sda2 --dir=/path/os|
I have not found any other info.
Is there documentation elsewhere that has more details on the use of an
OS tree?
Thanks for your help,
David
8 years, 4 months
USB curosity
by Geoffrey Leach
I have a LaserJet 1300 printer that connects via a Belkin parallel port-to-USB connector. When I send a document to the printer, half the time it prints without hesitation; other times it stalls until I disconnect and re-connect the USB cable. When I do that, here's what dmesg reports:
[80924.737154] usb 4-1.1: USB disconnect, device number 4
[80924.737587] usblp0: removed
[80926.381095] usb 4-1.1: new full-speed USB device number 5 using ehci-pci
[80926.472738] usb 4-1.1: New USB device found, idVendor=050d, idProduct=0002
[80926.472749] usb 4-1.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
[80926.472755] usb 4-1.1: Product: IEEE-1284 Controller
[80926.472759] usb 4-1.1: Manufacturer: Belk USB Printing Support
[80926.497804] usblp 4-1.1:1.0: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 5 if 0 alt 1 proto 2 vid 0x050D pid 0x0002
CUPS discovers the printer without any problems. However, when I send the test document from CUPS, no amount of fiddling with the USB cable will cause it to print.
Any insights will be greatly appreciated.
Firefox 23; kernel 4.2.6-301.fc23.x86_64 #1 SMP, everything up to date.
8 years, 4 months
some errors on boot
by Frank White
Hi, as my previous messages I have some problems to boot.
One error is that F. does not find some users..
Those are the errors:
Dec 14 12:49:54 localhost chronyd[818]: chronyd version 1.31.1 starting
Dec 14 12:49:54 localhost chronyd[818]: Fatal error : getpwnam(chrony) failed
Dec 14 12:49:54 localhost avahi-daemon[813]: Failed to find user 'avahi'.
Dec 14 12:49:54 localhost rpcbind[823]: cannot get uid of 'rpc':
Permission denied
BUT
# egrep -i "chrony|avahi" passwd shadow group
passwd:avahi:x:70:70:Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD Stack:/var/run/avahi-daemon:/sbin/nologin
passwd:avahi-autoipd:x:170:170:Avahi IPv4LL
Stack:/var/lib/avahi-autoipd:/sbin/nologin
passwd:chrony:x:993:992::/var/lib/chrony:/sbin/nologin
shadow:avahi:!!:15883::::::
shadow:avahi-autoipd:!!:15883::::::
shadow:chrony:!!:15883::::::
group:avahi:x:70:
group:avahi-autoipd:x:170:
group:chrony:x:992:
Thank u.
8 years, 4 months
Re: using an OS tree to do remote install fails
by dcw
On 12/15/2015 04:20 PM, cs wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 03:20 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 12/15/2015 01:09 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
>>> I have been using the following with no problems:
>>> url --url
>>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/22/Everything/i386/os/
>>>
>>> However, One computer I need to upgrade is in another city and in an
>>> area that has power outages on occasion but It has battery backup.
>>> During a netinstall, if the power goes out while downloading the
>>> packages -- that would require me to go to the location. So I am
>>> trying
>>> to use a local OS tree for the install. This will reduce the risk from
>>> power outage.
>>>
>>> The documentation says the following:
>>>
>>> |harddrive|
>>> Install from a tree or full installation ISO image on a local hard
>>> drive. The tree or ISO image must be on a file system which is
>>> mountable in the installation environment. Supported file systems
>>> are |ext2|, |ext3|, |ext4|, |vfat|, or |xfs|.
>>>
>>> |install| |harddrive --partition= | --biospart= [--dir=]|
>>>
>>> |--partition=|
>>> Partition to install from (such as |sdb2|).
>>> |--biospart=|
>>> BIOS partition to install from (such as |82p2|).
>>> |--dir=|
>>> Directory containing the installation tree or ISO image.
>>>
>>>
>>> I only have one drive in the computer: /dev/sda.
>>>
>>> When I use:
>>>
>>> |harddrive --partition=/dev/sda2 --dir=/path/os|
>>>
>>> The target mount points are:
>>> sda1 is mounted as /
>>> sda2 is mounted as /home
>>>
>>> The errors are that the drive is not found for install and os tree also
>>> fails.
>>>
>>> I also tried:
>>>
>>> |harddrive --partition=sda2 --dir=/path/os|
>>>
>>>
>>> I have not found any other info.
>>>
>>> Is there documentation elsewhere that has more details on the use of an
>>> OS tree?
>>
>> You choose either "--partition=" OR "--biospart=" OR "--dir=", not
>> multiples (the "|" character means "OR"). In your case, you'd do
>>
>> install harddrive --dir=/path/to/isofile
> Using --dir only, I get an error that says the partition or the
> biospart must be specified.
> Also I am trying to use a os tree that I downloaded from
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/23/Everything/i386/os/
>
>
> David
>>
>> For example, if the ISO file is
>> /home/ISOFiles/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-23-10.iso, then I think you'd
>> use:
>>
>> install harddrive
>> --dir=/home/ISOFiles/Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-23-10.iso
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks(a)alldigital.com -
>> - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 -
>> - -
>> - UNIX is actually quite user friendly. The problem is that it's -
>> - just very picky of who its friends are! -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
8 years, 4 months
VNC and sound
by Chris Kottaridis
I am running Fedora 22 on a machine that is off in a closet and am using
VNC to access it from a machine at my desk. I followed the instructions
in System Admin guide chapter 8:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/System_Administrators...
I successfully got Tiger VNC server working. it was quite easy. Cudos to
everyone involved to make that so simple.
My VNC client is Windows TigerVNC version 1.5.
I don't seem to get sound. It doesn't seem to come out on my VNC client
or on the VNC server's sound card. My remote machine is close enough
that I could run a wire from it's sound card to the speakers on my desk
if that is easier. But, right now I can;t get the sound to come out the
VNC server sound card.
Any pointers or recommendations are appreciated.
Thanks
Chris Kottaridis
8 years, 4 months