Re: perl-Math-GSL
by Patrick Dupre
Thank,
I am trying to do like indicated:
However, I got a message error, and the rpm file has not been created.
Would you have some recommandations?
cd /home/pdupre/rpmbuild/SOURCES
+ cd Math-GSL-0.27
+ ./Build test
Process XS files version 1.15
t/00-load.t ........ 40/53 # Testing Math::GSL 0.27 on i386-linux-thread-multi, Perl (/usr/bin/perl) 5.016003
t/00-load.t ........ ok
t/01-pod.t ......... skipped: Test::Pod 1.00 required for testing POD
t/BLAS.t ........... ok
t/BSpline.t ........ ok
t/CBLAS.t .......... ok
t/CDF.t ............ ok
t/Chebyshev.t ...... 1/10
# Failed test 'GSL_CHEB_CALC_DERIV died (Bizarre copy of UNKNOWN in subroutine entry at t/Chebyshev.t line 59.)'
# at t/Chebyshev.t line 72.
# (in Math::GSL::Chebyshev::Test->GSL_CHEB_CALC_DERIV)
# Failed test 'GSL_CHEB_CALC_INTEGRAL died (Bizarre copy of UNKNOWN in subroutine entry at t/Chebyshev.t line 68.)'
# at t/Chebyshev.t line 72.
# (in Math::GSL::Chebyshev::Test->GSL_CHEB_CALC_INTEGRAL)
Files=52, Tests=3974, 20 wallclock secs ( 1.41 usr 0.18 sys + 13.47 cusr 1.09 csys = 16.15 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 8/52 test programs. 23/3974 subtests failed.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AdepTq (%check)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AdepTq (%check)
/usr/bin/rpmbuild exited with value 1
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Package perl-Math-GSL does not seem to be available on a rpm
> > packaging.
> > What do you recommand?
> > make an rpm or install it through the cpan installer?
> >
>
> I'd use cpanspec to make an rpm. I'm slightly nervous about mixing
> cpan-installed modules and rpm-installed modules in the same Perl
> installation.
>
> This presentation might be useful (but beware, it's five years old)
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/davorg/perl-in-rpmland-presentation
>
> Dave...
>
> --
> Dave Cross :: dave(a)dave.org.uk
> http://dave.org.uk/
> @davorg
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 11 months
Re: add application launcher
by Patrick Dupre
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Augustin Wolf
> Sent: 07/20/13 02:46 PM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: add application launcher
>
> On 20 July 2013 11:41, Patrick Dupre <pdupre(a)gmx.com> wrote:
> > in Fedora 18 I was able to add an application launcher by clicking right
> > on the application menu or by using alacarte
> > This option does not work in fedora 19. Is there an alternative?
> what kind of Window Manager are you referring to? I'm using XLDE and
> adding new launcher works like a charm.
Using gnome
> --
> users mailing list
> users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 11 months
Password In The Clear
by Mark LaPierre
On 07/18/2013 11:59 PM, users-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>>> > SNIP <<<<
> You can also visit your membership page at
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/options/users/marklapier%40aol.com
>
>
> On your membership page, you can change various delivery options such
> as your email address and whether you get digests or not. As a
> reminder, your membership password is
>
> Fedora13List
>
> If you have any questions or problems, you can contact the list owner
> at
>
> users-owner(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
Does anyone else question the wisdom of sending out passwords "in the
clear" in unencrypted email?
--
_
°v°
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/
****
10 years, 11 months
Kernel Panic
by Mickey
Fedora 18
Did a update and reboot, got a kernel panic in NEW kernel can't get into
Linux.
At Bootup at kernel Window I tried to hit Down-Arrow to goto second
kernel in menu but hitting Down-Arrow won't respond.
I guess i will have to go into the back door with a Fedora-18-Netinst CD
and do the following procedure;
chroot /mnt/sysimage
su
cd /boot/grub2
vi grub.cfg
To the first Menu-list and remove NEW kernel , so it will boot on second
older kernel.
Am i using the best procedure to get rid of the NEW kernel ?
10 years, 11 months
RE: F19 raid 1 stuck read only after reboot
by Alan Gagne
> >>/ "SMART is not a reliable warning system for impending failure
> />/ Maybe not, but when I had one of these drives going bad about a year ago.
> />/ It did a great job of warning that I had an impending drive failure.
> />/ The relocated sector count would jump in small blocks over time.
> /
> Interesting, did you get a warning message?
Yes, Root got an email on the first occurrence and then after each re-boot.
Also there was something in logwatch email.
> I had to remove udisksd2
> because it kept polling SMART information from a disk that should be
> asleep and not kept awake all the time. I was wondering what the SMART
> information is polled for.
>
> >/ The intel storage manager I use under Windows currently does not
> />/ have any warnings about the drives.
> />/
> />/ The bios screen that displays array health when the system comes up
> />/ shows both arrays as healthy.
> />/
> />/ Smart,Intel and the bios were all in agreement when I had a failing
> />/ disk in the past.
> /
> Then I guess we can assume that the disks have not failed.
>
> >>/ Do you see any messages in /var/log/messages that could be relevant?
> />/ These are the only messages that seem relevant from journalctl -xb
> />/
> />/ Jul 19 07:35:26 knucklehead.xxxx.com kernel: device-mapper: table:
> />/ 253:4: linear: dm-linear: Device lookup failed
> />/ Jul 19 07:35:26 knucklehead.xxxx.com kernel: device-mapper: ioctl:
> />/ error adding target to table
> /
> It seems likely that this is what causes your problem. When you google
> for the error message, there are a lot of reports about it. You could
> look into them and try to figure out how to solve the issue --- someone
> said old meta information caused it, someone else said removing a
> package that provides dmraid fixed it for them ...
Yea, I have been looking at those. I was hoping that between here and
filing a bug
I would get the best answer.
Thanks
Alan
10 years, 11 months
Re: Fedora 19 did not install boot record
by Vinny Onelli
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:40:26 +0200
> From: Heinz Diehl <htd(a)fritha.org>
> To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Fedora 19 did not install boot record
> Message-ID: <20130719214026.GA7811(a)fritha.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On 19.07.2013, Vinny Onelli wrote:
>
> > grub-install: command not found
> > did I missed some thing during the installation?
>
> You want "grub2-install" ;-)
>
it could not find sda
/usr/sbin/grub2-bios-setup:error:disk hostdisk//dev/sda not found
10 years, 11 months
How to execute gpk-application from modern Gnome
by Sam Varshavchik
I can't find a way to start gpk-application from modern Gnome desktop. It's
nowhere to be found in Activities. Typing "software" brings up nothing. Of
course, the brand-spanking new Gnome in F20 apparently feels its too
cumbersome to list all installed applications, like in earlier versions.
gpk-application runs fine from terminal.
10 years, 11 months
Problem upgrading nvidia in Fedora-19
by Jonathan Ryshpan
A version conflict is making it impossible to upgrade my system to the
latest kernel and/or native nvidia drivers. Usually these conflicts
clear up after a few days, when the repositories come into sync but this
one has been around for quite a while.
The system is a
4-processor x86_64 system running
Fedora-19 with most upgrades installed
current kernel is kernel-3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64
current nvidia rpms are:
nvidia-settings-desktop-1.0-32.fc19.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-304xx-3.9.6-200.fc18.x86_64-304.88-1.fc18.2.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-libs-304.88-5.fc19.x86_64
akmod-nvidia-304xx-304.88-1.fc19.3.x86_64
nvidia-settings-1.0-32.fc19.x86_64
nvidia-xconfig-1.0-28.fc19.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-304xx-3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64-304.88-1.fc19.6.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-304.88-5.fc19.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-libs-304.88-5.fc19.i686
The bottom line is that yum upgrade fails as follows; a complete upgrade
log is attached.
# yum --skip-broken upgrade
...
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
1:akmod-nvidia-319.32-1.fc19.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
akmod-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-1.fc19.4.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree
kernel-3.9.9-302.fc19.x86_64 from updates
libXvMC-1.0.8-1.fc19.i686 from updates
libXvMC-1.0.8-1.fc19.x86_64 from updates
1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-4.fc19.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-libs-173.14.37-2.fc19.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-304.88-9.fc19.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-libs-304.88-9.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304xx-libs-304.88-9.fc19.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-319.32-4.fc19.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
Thanks - jon
10 years, 11 months