Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Bryan Kearney wrote:
> The existing spins process as documented [1] is pretty close to
> reality, but there is some confusion over the separation of duties. So,
> I took a crack at editing this [2] to what I think it should be. I
> believe this is the applicable process for "official" spins which will
> carry the Fedora Trademark and be hosted by the spins page.
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
> -- bk
>
> [1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Spins/SpinSubmissionProcess
> [2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkearney/ProposedSpinProcess
Yeey! Feedback! ;-)
I have applied the updates based on folks suggestions. Jeroen, I tried
to be a bit more specific about what the conents of the review are at
each stage then in the text you sent. It is frustrating to have a
technical review at _each_ level in the process that covers the same
items. I believe that the main technical items should be defined by the
board/FESCO and then enforced during step 2.
Comments are appreciated.
-- bk