Looking a bit into licensee, I am still not convinced that Faraday 2 is
really needed.
So far, I have reduced the number of test failures to 25 and non of them
is related to "octokit" or "faraday". So while having Faraday 2+ is
nice
on itself, I don't think this is blocker for your case.
Vít
Dne 14. 10. 23 v 18:59 Benson Muite napsal(a):
Am working on packaging rubygem-licensee as it would probably be a
useful complement to scancode-toolkit and other similar tools. It
requires rubygem-faraday >= 2.0 but rubygem-elasticsearch-transport for
elasticsearch 7 requires rubygem-faraday >~ 1.0 so am packaging it as
rubygem-faraday2. Hope this will be ok.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244212
Issue upstream:
https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-ruby/issues/2228
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraprojec...
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue