ruby-sig January 2018

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
7 discussions

Ruby 2.2
by Vít Ondruch 22 Sep '23

22 Sep '23

Hi everybody, Since Ruby 2.2 is going to be released during Christmas and -preview1 release is imminent (this Wednesday?), it is probably time to start looking into its packaging. So here is the updated .spec file [1] and scratch build [2], which can be finally build on all platforms. Sorry, no Copr for you, since Ruby's build fails there due to old RHEL kernel :/. What has changed from packaging point of view? Luckily, not much, but here are a few bullets which comes to my mind: * RPM 4.12 introduces new %load function, which is used to load RPM macros during RPM build. This allowed to drop my custom RPM macro [3]. On the other hand, you'll be able to build the Ruby only on F21+ (luckily, you should be able to build SRPM everywhere). * The RubyGems filesystem was not explicit enough, so there might be something accidentally packages. This is now more explicit, so we should be safer. * Ruby now ships with MiniTest and Test::Unit. The very good news is that they are installed so far as a regular gems. This means that you have to always specify them in your Gemfile, if you are using Bundler, but this is generally step in good direction. I hope that upstream will not change their mind :) Due to this change, we have new subpackages rubygem-test-unit (and rubygem-power_assert, which is now Test::Unit's dependency). No more %{_bindir}/testrb (but nobody is using it these days anyway, right? ;) * Some prevailing test failures were resolved, some others introduced, but hopefully they'll get resolved prior stable release. Generally, I'd say that not much has changed since 2.1, which is good news. Please test the packaging if you can and let me know about any issues you encountered. Also, if you have any other suggestions about Ruby packaging in general, what we could improve etc, this is probably good time to share. It seems that OpenSUSE guys are improving their packaging, so you might want to get some inspiration there [4, 5, 6] ;) Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.2 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7578843 [3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/commit/?h=private-ruby-2.2&id=8… [4] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby-common [5] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby2.2 [6] https://github.com/openSUSE/gem2rpm/commits/master

4 19

Ruby 2.5
by Vít Ondruch 07 May '18

07 May '18

Hi all, Ruby 2.4 was released during Christmas and the upcoming Ruby 2.5 development is advancing, so I continue in the tradition and I got r58319 packaged for testing. The updated .spec file is available in dist-git private-ruby-2.5 branch and here is the scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18952639 One thing I'd like to point out that upstream is working on gemification of StdLib. The question ATM is what the result will be. Hence, there is one big TODO in the .spec file [1]. The question if each of the gems should be unbundled or not. The future will tell hopefully. Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ruby.git/tree/ruby.spec?h=private-r…

3 27

GMP usage in Ruby
by Vít Ondruch 06 Mar '18

06 Mar '18

Hi all, It seems that since Ruby 2.1, Ruby can use GMP [1] to make some math operation faster. Should we enable it? Any experience? Vít [1] https://gmplib.org/

1 2

Hey Ruby packagers: can you help with asciibinder and its dependencies?
by Matthew Miller 07 Feb '18

07 Feb '18

We're using a new system for http://docs.fedoraproject.org. It's in Ruby, and as per tradition requires a number of ruby gems not packaged in Fedora. The upstream is at https://github.com/redhataccess/ascii_binder, and it looks like we're missing diff_dirs, asciibinder-diagram, guard, guard-shell, guard-livereload, pandoc-ruby, sitemap_generator, and yajl-ruby. Plus something called "trollop" which needs to be a version in f27/rawhide but not yet in f26. Can you help? Running asciibinder locally is very convenient while writing or converting docs, and having it a `dnf install` away would be really nice.

5 21

Orphaning rubygem-omniauth
by Jun Aruga 31 Jan '18

31 Jan '18

Hello Ruby SIG, I want to do orphan rubygem-omniauth package that I am a main maintainer, as I am not interested in maintaining this package now. Do you want to maintain this package as a main maintainer? If do that, please tell me. This package is not a dependency of any packages. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-omniauth/bugs Jun

1 0

ruby gem install does not work with GEM_HOME and GEM_PATH
by Jun Aruga 24 Jan '18

24 Jan '18

Hello, I ran "gem install" with environment variables GEM_HOME and GEM_PATH on mock environment for Fedora rawhide with user acoount. The message of "gem install" shows that is success. But the gem is actually not installed for expected directory. Is this expected behavior? or bug? This is the reason of currently rubygem-bundler's local test with enabling tests is failed since Ruby 2.5.0 on Fedora rawhide. Below builds are success as tests are not enabled. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/rubygem-bundler $ rpm -q ruby ruby-2.5.0-87.fc28.x86_64 $ id uid=28707(mockbuild) gid=135(mock) groups=135(mock) $ mkdir /builddir/work $ cd /builddir/work $ export GEM_HOME=/builddir/work $ export GEM_PATH=/builddir/work $ gem env RubyGems Environment: - RUBYGEMS VERSION: 2.7.3 - RUBY VERSION: 2.5.0 (2017-12-25 patchlevel 0) [x86_64-linux] - INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: /builddir/work - USER INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: /builddir/.gem/ruby - RUBY EXECUTABLE: /usr/bin/ruby - EXECUTABLE DIRECTORY: /builddir/work/bin - SPEC CACHE DIRECTORY: /builddir/.gem/specs - SYSTEM CONFIGURATION DIRECTORY: /etc - RUBYGEMS PLATFORMS: - ruby - x86_64-linux - GEM PATHS: - /builddir/work - GEM CONFIGURATION: - :update_sources => true - :verbose => true - :backtrace => false - :bulk_threshold => 1000 - "gem" => "--user-install --bindir /builddir/bin" - REMOTE SOURCES: - https://rubygems.org/ - SHELL PATH: - /usr/local/bin - /usr/bin - /usr/local/sbin - /usr/sbin - /builddir/.local/bin - /builddir/bin $ gem install 'rack:1.6.6' --no-rdoc --no-ri Fetching: rack-1.6.6.gem (100%) Successfully installed rack-1.6.6 1 gem installed Some files are created. But gems directory is empty. bin directory is not created. $ ls -F build_info/ cache/ doc/ extensions/ gems/ rack-1.6.6.gem specifications/ $ ls gems/ => no result. $ gem list *** LOCAL GEMS *** cmath (default: 1.0.0) csv (default: 1.0.0) date (default: 1.0.0) dbm (default: 1.0.0) etc (default: 1.0.0) fcntl (default: 1.0.0) fiddle (default: 1.0.0) fileutils (default: 1.0.2) gdbm (default: 2.0.0) ipaddr (default: 1.2.0) scanf (default: 1.0.0) sdbm (default: 1.0.0) stringio (default: 0.0.1) strscan (default: 1.0.0) webrick (default: 1.4.2) zlib (default: 1.0.0) <= rack is not shown in the result of "gem list". -- Jun

2 1

Ruby 2.5 - Mass rebuild
by Vít Ondruch 11 Jan '18

11 Jan '18

Hi all, It is already tradition that in this time of the year, new Ruby version is released. Since Ruby change proposal [1] was already accepted in advance, nothing can stop us from rebuild of ruby* binary packages. I asked relengs for side tag [2] and built there Ruby and rubygem-json already. Now its is time for your help. This is the list of packages, which very likely needs rebuild: ``` $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' | sort | uniq ``` You can take the package and just fire rebuild, but please ensure that you are using f28-ruby build target [2], i.e. the build command should look like: ``` $ fedpkg build --target f28-ruby ``` Please be careful, because if you, by a chance, omit the f28-ruby target, you'll be building against Ruby 2.4 which is not what you want. If you won't do it by yourself, I'll be rebuilding all packages after I am finished with my packages. I'll be using fermig [3] to help mi with that. If you don't want me to touch your packages for whatever reason, please let me know. You can follow the progress at: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=3299&order=-bu… or using: ``` $ koji list-tagged f28-ruby ``` As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome. Vít [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.4 [2] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7228 [3] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig

3 10

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig January 2018