ruby-sig August 2016

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
5 discussions

Ruby 2.2
by Vít Ondruch 22 Sep '23

22 Sep '23

Hi everybody, Since Ruby 2.2 is going to be released during Christmas and -preview1 release is imminent (this Wednesday?), it is probably time to start looking into its packaging. So here is the updated .spec file [1] and scratch build [2], which can be finally build on all platforms. Sorry, no Copr for you, since Ruby's build fails there due to old RHEL kernel :/. What has changed from packaging point of view? Luckily, not much, but here are a few bullets which comes to my mind: * RPM 4.12 introduces new %load function, which is used to load RPM macros during RPM build. This allowed to drop my custom RPM macro [3]. On the other hand, you'll be able to build the Ruby only on F21+ (luckily, you should be able to build SRPM everywhere). * The RubyGems filesystem was not explicit enough, so there might be something accidentally packages. This is now more explicit, so we should be safer. * Ruby now ships with MiniTest and Test::Unit. The very good news is that they are installed so far as a regular gems. This means that you have to always specify them in your Gemfile, if you are using Bundler, but this is generally step in good direction. I hope that upstream will not change their mind :) Due to this change, we have new subpackages rubygem-test-unit (and rubygem-power_assert, which is now Test::Unit's dependency). No more %{_bindir}/testrb (but nobody is using it these days anyway, right? ;) * Some prevailing test failures were resolved, some others introduced, but hopefully they'll get resolved prior stable release. Generally, I'd say that not much has changed since 2.1, which is good news. Please test the packaging if you can and let me know about any issues you encountered. Also, if you have any other suggestions about Ruby packaging in general, what we could improve etc, this is probably good time to share. It seems that OpenSUSE guys are improving their packaging, so you might want to get some inspiration there [4, 5, 6] ;) Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.2 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7578843 [3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/commit/?h=private-ruby-2.2&id=8… [4] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby-common [5] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby2.2 [6] https://github.com/openSUSE/gem2rpm/commits/master

4 19

ruby-sig FAS group and rubygems build in Copr
by Vít Ondruch 20 Apr '17

20 Apr '17

Hi everybody, You probably noticed, that there is ongoing build of all Python packages in Copr [1] and today, I was approached by Miroslav Suchý, that he'd like to do the same for rubygems. And this in turn triggered these questions: 1) Would you be interested to create ruby-sig group in FAS? We could make the group owner of some packages and in turn, the members of the group could maintain the packages, without explicitly asking for some ACLs. 2) For the Copr rebuild of rubygems, there needs to be some FAS group again. Python guys are asking for "pypi-builds-sig" group [2], hence following their lead, I'd like to ask for "rubygems-builds-sig" group (note that although I don't like the '-sig' suffix in this case, it is mandated by the infrastructure ticket template). So what are your thoughts? Vít [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5311

5 11

Ruby 2.4
by Vít Ondruch 02 Jan '17

02 Jan '17

Hi everybody, Time is running past and it is almost 6 months of development of Ruby 2.4. So I started to prepare some test build again. I am pushing all the changes into private-ruby-2.4 branch of dist-git if you are interested and here is the build of r55184: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14278233 One notable change is that XMLRPC library was extracted into separate gem, so rubygem-xmlrpc is now available as Ruby subpackage. Please give it a try and let me know if anything goes wrong. Vít

2 19

Celluloid back to Fedora
by Germano Massullo 20 Sep '16

20 Sep '16

Hi I am writing to you to let you know that rubygem-celluloid will be back again into Fedora repositories. I am actually taking care of all runtime dependencies. If you want to help me by doing some Package Reviews, here some of them https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370096 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370135 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370138 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370153 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370158 Thank you very much

4 8

Review swap
by František Dvořák 02 Aug '16

02 Aug '16

Hello, anybody interested in review or review swap with these packages?: rubygem-rails-controller-testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361334 rubygem-sinatra-cross_origin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344101 The first one is needed for newer rubygem-responders with Rails 5 (for testing). Thank you, František

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig August 2016