ruby-sig October 2013

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
5 discussions

BASH completion for Ruby
by Vít Ondruch 25 May '16

25 May '16

Hi guys, Anybody have any experience with some scripts for bash completion? Have you tried any? Should we integrate any? Just a quick googling gave me two results: https://github.com/mernen/completion-ruby https://github.com/pdkl95/rubygems-completion And there are probably others. I did not tried them yet. Have you? Do you have other/better tips? Thank you Vit

2 3

Ruby 2.1.0
by Vít Ondruch 23 Dec '13

23 Dec '13

Hi Rubyists! I have pushed .spec file for Ruby 2.1.0 preview1 into private-ruby-2.1 [1] branch of Ruby's dist-git repository and I'll be pushing there further changes leading into Ruby 2.1.0 package for Fedora 21. However: * ATM, it doesn't build in Koji unfortunately, since there seems to be some deadlock in test suite. Nevertheless, it builds (almost) fine in mock on my computer. * preview1 ships with preview version of RubyGems 2.2 and RDoc 4.1.0 which produces nonconforming package names such as "rubygems-2.2.0.preview.1-0.15.preview1.fc21.noarch.rpm". Since I expect that final version will ship non-preview versions, I don't care much about the names. Please test the package if you like. Any feedback (and help/patches ;) is welcome. Thanks Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.1

2 5

I need rubygem-net-ssh-multi 1.20
by "Guillermo Gómez S." 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

Hi, rubygem-net-ssh-multi dear maintainer and ruby sig group... ;) I need rubygem-net-ssh to be updated to 1.2.0 version... (needed for latest rubygem-rhc). Let me know if i can help -- Guillermo http://gomix.fedora-ve.org

3 4

rubygems 2.1.9 on rawhide and F-20
by Mamoru TASAKA 23 Oct '13

23 Oct '13

Hello, all: With a lot of help from Vít and test by Josef wrt gem2rpm, I am going to update rubygems on rawhide and F-20 to 2.1.9. As far as I tested, it seems to be going well. Please fetch and test it, thank you. Note that on F-19 rubygems will stay with 2.0.x (currently 2.0.12) and on F-18 1.8.x (currently 1.8.25 with patched). Regards, Mamoru

3 2

Filtering automatic provides
by Vít Ondruch 03 Oct '13

03 Oct '13

Hi Rubyists, Binary ruby- and rubygem- packages ships .so files. These .so files are picked up by RPM's automatic Requires/Provides generater and they are listed among provides, e.g.: $ repoquery -q --provides rubygem-sqlite3 rubygem(sqlite3) = 1.3.5-4.fc19 rubygem-sqlite3 = 1.3.5-4.fc19 rubygem-sqlite3(x86-64) = 1.3.5-4.fc19 sqlite3_native.so()(64bit) However, these .so files are not useful outside of Ruby world and they might even conflict with some system library (although I don't have any example at my hand currently). So I believe, we should filter out these automatic provides, as is done in Perl for example. Therefore, since F19, there are available %{?ruby_default_filter} and %{?rubygems_default_filter} macros, which allow to filter out these provides. For your curiosity, this is their implementation: %ruby_default_filter %{expand: \ %global __provides_exclude_from %{?__provides_exclude_from:%{__provides_exclude_from}|}^(%{ruby_vendorarchdir}|%{ruby_sitearchdir})/.*\\\\.so$ \ } %rubygems_default_filter %{expand: \ %global __provides_exclude_from %{?__provides_exclude_from:%{__provides_exclude_from}|}^%{gem_extdir_mri}/.*\\\\.so$ \ } If nobody objects, I am going to propose usage of these macros into Ruby packaging guidelines [1]. Vít [1] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=PackagingDrafts/Ruby&diff=35155…

1 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig October 2013