Additionally, what is the reason for having Faraday 2? It seems
octokit
requires Faraday, but version 1 should be fine. I am not sure about
Licensee itself, but on the first look, it seems they are having some
troubles with Faraday 2, but I don't see there any direct dependency ...
Vít
Dne 16. 10. 23 v 12:58 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dear Benson,
>
> Yeah, the situation about Faraday is a bit unfortunate. I think that
> also rubygem-typhoeus depends on Faraday 1:
>
>
https://github.com/typhoeus/typhoeus/blob/f5c5751df49089da89fc2683a23df04...
>
> Nevertheless, would you be open to rather rename the current package
> to `rubygem-faraday1` and afterwards bump the `rubygem-faraday` to
> version 2? I understand it is more work initially, but it is better
> long term.
That is ok, though there are dependencies for the latest version of
faraday that are not in Fedora. Based on the guidelines:
Should I request a review of faraday1? Would still need to have
dependencies of the latest version of faraday reviewed. Maybe it is
conveniient to do this in a sidetag