https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152319
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
You are right that the patch is wrong. The only slnames that need a correction
are the LGPL's. I think more appropriate place for a dependency on
Software::License is Module::Build rather then Module::Starter.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C3OPMWr0Nb&a=cc_unsubscribe