perl-devel January 2019

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

9 participants
249 discussions

[Bug 1666098] New: Overspecification in perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666098 Bug ID: 1666098 Summary: Overspecification in perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, iarnell(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tcallawa(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The following command is supposed to return the ldflags that are needed to link with libperl. Instead, it returns everything that has been specified when building libperl itself. Not limited to Fedora's global flags and several libraries that aren't needed when linking shared. As a result, programs relink also with those libs instead of just libperl. $ perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -fstack-protector-strong -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE -lperl -lpthread -lresolv -ldl -lm -lcrypt -lutil -lc Please clean up the flags and return only -L/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE -lperl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[rpms/perl] PR #1: Make builds for inclusion in an application Flatpak work
by Owen Taylor 18 Oct '23

18 Oct '23

otaylor opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are following: `` Make builds for inclusion in an application Flatpak work `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/1

2 3

[Bug 1661251] New: Fails due to uninitialised value
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 Jun '22

21 Jun '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661251 Bug ID: 1661251 Summary: Fails due to uninitialised value Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl-Parse-DMIDecode Assignee: ddick(a)cpan.org Reporter: squinney(a)inf.ed.ac.uk QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ddick(a)cpan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1515903 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1515903&action=edit Initialise structures to zero to avoid potential problem with numeric comparison Description of problem: We use the Parse::DMIDecode perl module on all our EL7 machines as part of our inventory system. Mostly it works fine but on a small number of machines it fails with this error about an uninitialized value: perl -MParse::DMIDecode -wE 'my $decoder = new Parse::DMIDecode; $decoder->probe' Use of uninitialized value $data{"structures"} in numeric lt (<) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Parse/DMIDecode.pm line 160. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.03-5 How reproducible: About 1% of our machines, I've not checked but probably all similar hardware. Additional info: This seems to be similar to a bug reported in CPAN many years ago: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=54956 except that the supplied patch in that report does NOT work. I have attached a patch which fixes the problem when applied to the 0.03-5 SRPM. Regards, Stephen Quinney -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum] PR #1: Don't remove buildroot in %install
by Ondřej Lysoněk 24 Jul '20

24 Jul '20

olysonek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum` that you are following: `` Don't remove buildroot in %install `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum/pull-request/1

2 5

[rpms/perl-Encode-Detect] PR #1: Remove old cruft
by Ondřej Lysoněk 14 Feb '20

14 Feb '20

olysonek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Encode-Detect` that you are following: `` Remove old cruft `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Encode-Detect/pull-request/1

2 3

[rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random] PR #1: Drop Group tag
by Ondřej Lysoněk 29 Jan '20

29 Jan '20

olysonek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random` that you are following: `` Drop Group tag `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/pull-request/1

1 2

[rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA] PR #1: Drop Group tag
by Ondřej Lysoněk 29 Jan '20

29 Jan '20

olysonek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA` that you are following: `` Drop Group tag `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA/pull-request/1

1 2

[Bug 1670372] New: Upgrade perl-Net-SFTP-Foreign to 1.90
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 Jun '19

20 Jun '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670372 Bug ID: 1670372 Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-SFTP-Foreign to 1.90 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-SFTP-Foreign Assignee: fedorapkg(a)rule.lv Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedorapkg(a)rule.lv, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest Fedora delivers 1.89 version. Upstream released 1.90. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1664030] New: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-Type-0.02-35.fc30 FTBFS: tests fail with perl-DBD-SQLite-1.62-1.fc30
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 May '19

07 May '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664030 Bug ID: 1664030 Summary: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-Type-0.02-35.fc30 FTBFS: tests fail with perl-DBD-SQLite-1.62-1.fc30 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/build/5873222 Status: NEW Component: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-Type Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tcallawa(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- External Bug ID: CPAN 128135 Classification: Fedora perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-Type-0.02-35.fc30 fails to build in Fedora 30 because tests fail: $ perl -Iblib/{lib,arch} t/1.t 1..6 ok 1 - use Class::DBI::Plugin::Type; not ok 2 - notes is text # Failed test 'notes is text' # at t/1.t line 28. # undef # doesn't match '(?^:text|blob)' not ok 3 - tasted is a date # Failed test 'tasted is a date' # at t/1.t line 29. # got: undef # expected: 'date' not ok 4 - price is decimal # Failed test 'price is decimal' # at t/1.t line 30. # undef # doesn't match '(?^:^decimal)' not ok 5 - id is integer # Failed test 'id is integer' # at t/1.t line 31. # undef # doesn't match '(?^:^int)' not ok 6 - name is varchar # Failed test 'name is varchar' # at t/1.t line 32. # undef # doesn't match '(?^:^varchar)' # Looks like you failed 5 tests of 6. A difference between passing and failing build root is at <https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/build/5873222>. This is triggered by upgrading perl-DBD-SQLite from 1.60-1.fc30 to 1.62-1.fc30. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 1664038] New: perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.52-11.fc30 FTBFS: test fail after making /usr/bin/gpg GnuPG2
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 31 Mar '19

31 Mar '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664038 Bug ID: 1664038 Summary: perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.52-11.fc30 FTBFS: test fail after making /usr/bin/gpg GnuPG2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/build/5781872 Status: NEW Component: perl-GnuPG-Interface Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, xavier(a)bachelot.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.52-11.fc30 fails to build in Fedora 30 because tests fail: t/clearsign.t .............. Failed 2/2 subtests t/decrypt.t ................ Failed 4/4 subtests t/detach_sign.t ............ Failed 2/2 subtests t/encrypt.t ................ ok t/encrypt_symmetrically.t .. ok t/export_keys.t ............ ok t/Fingerprint.t ............ ok t/get_public_keys.t ........ Failed 1/3 subtests t/get_secret_keys.t ........ Failed 2/2 subtests t/import_keys.t ............ ok t/Interface.t .............. ok t/list_public_keys.t ....... ok t/list_secret_keys.t ....... Failed 1/4 subtests t/list_sigs.t .............. ok BUILDSTDERR: gpg: using "0xF950DA9C" as default secret key for signing BUILDSTDERR: gpg: signing failed: No pinentry BUILDSTDERR: gpg: signing failed: No pinentry t/passphrase_handling.t .... Failed 3/3 subtests t/sign.t ................... Failed 2/2 subtests t/sign_and_encrypt.t ....... Failed 2/2 subtests t/UserId.t ................. ok t/verify.t ................. ok t/wrap_call.t .............. ok Test Summary Report ------------------- t/clearsign.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 1-2 t/decrypt.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 4) Failed tests: 1-4 t/detach_sign.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 1-2 t/get_public_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1) Failed test: 3 t/get_secret_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 1-2 t/list_secret_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 t/passphrase_handling.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 3) Failed tests: 1-3 t/sign.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 1-2 t/sign_and_encrypt.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 1-2 Files=20, Tests=52, 15 wallclock secs ( 0.15 usr 0.08 sys + 11.65 cusr 1.94 csys = 13.82 CPU) Result: FAIL A difference between passing and failing build root is at <https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/build/5781872>. This is very probably triggered by replacing gnupg with gnupg2 <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation>. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel January 2019