[Bug 167797] New: perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167797
Summary: perl-DBD-Pg package doesn't Provide: perl(DBD::Pg)
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl-DBD-Pg
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: paul(a)city-fan.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The update to 1.43 appears to have introduced an issue where rpm does not
autogenerate the perl(DBD::Pg) virtual. So modules requiring this have to depend
on perl-DBD-Pg rather than perl(DBD::Pg) (e.g. bugzilla #166191). The FC3 and
FC4 packages do provide perl(DBD::Pg).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-DBD-Pg-1.43-1
How reproducible:
Easy
Steps to Reproduce:
rpm -q --provides perl-DBD-Pg
Actual results:
Pg.so
perl-DBD-Pg = 1.43-1
Expected results:
Pg.so
perl(DBD::Pg) = 1.43
perl-DBD-Pg = 1.43-1
Additional info:
Easy fix would just be to add the Provides: perl(DBD::Pg) = %{version} manually
in the spec file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 4 months
[Bug 168373] New: perl is compiled without 64bit int on i386
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168373
Summary: perl is compiled without 64bit int on i386
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: redhat(a)olen.net
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
perl is compiled without 64bit int on i386
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.7-0.3.fc5
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install perl
2. perl -e 'printf ("%x", 99999999999999)'
Actual results:
ffffffff
Expected results:
5af3107a3fff
Additional info:
>From the INSTALL manual:
"The use64bitint option does only as much as is required to get 64-bit integers
into Perl (this may mean, for example, using "long longs") while your memory may
still be limited to 2 gigabytes (because your pointers could still be 32-bit).
Note that the name 64bitint does not imply that your C compiler will be using
64-bit ints (it might, but it doesn't have to). The use64bitint simply means
that you will be able to have 64 bit-wide scalar values."
http://search.cpan.org/~nwclark/perl-5.8.6/INSTALL#Run_Configure
At least I need 64bit ints for some internal applications that needs to run on
both x86_64 and i386.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 4 months
[Bug 163219] perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163219
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-09-25 11:40 EST -------
t/primitive.................# Failed test 20 in t/primitive.t at line 120
# t/primitive.t line 120 is: eval '$c = all($b==pdl([[0,1],[2,2]]))'; ok(!$@
&& $c);
FAILED test 20
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/primitive.t 21 1 4.76% 20
9 tests and 35 subtests skipped.
Failed 1/96 test scripts, 98.96% okay. 1/817 subtests failed, 99.88% okay.
This happened twice on ppc, unknown if it happens on other archs. Should I make
test failures non-fatal? Please advise.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 5 months