perl-devel May 2023

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
230 discussions

[rpms/perl-NetAddr-IP] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros
by Tom Stellard 04 Oct '24

04 Oct '24

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-NetAddr-IP` that you are following: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-NetAddr-IP/pull-request/1

2 4

[Bug 1803973] New: CGI::Session is missing in epel8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Sep '24

19 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803973 Bug ID: 1803973 Summary: CGI::Session is missing in epel8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-CGI-Session Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net Reporter: netwiz(a)crc.id.au QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The perl-CGI-Session package is not available for EPEL8. Please import & build for EPEL8. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 2184301] New: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS: t/01_basic.t and 3more test fail
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Sep '24

07 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301 Bug ID: 2184301 Summary: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS: t/01_basic.t and 3more test fail Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax- Feature-Loop Status: NEW Component: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Link ID: CPAN 147485 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Package perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop fails to build from source in Fedora Rawhide. Bareword found where operator expected at t/01_basic.t line 20, near "loop" (Missing semicolon on previous line?) syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 19, near "; last " Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20. Global symbol "$i" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $i"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20. Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20. Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 21. syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 22, near "}" Can't redeclare "my" in "my" at t/01_basic.t line 26, near "my" syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 28, near "last if" syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 36, near "}" syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 38, near "}" t/01_basic.t has too many errors. # Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything. t/01_basic.t ............ Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Failed 4/4 subtests Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_a.t line 28, near "is" (Missing semicolon on previous line?) syntax error at t/02_pragma_a.t line 27, near "; last" BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_a.t line 31. # Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything. t/02_pragma_a.t ......... Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Failed 6/6 subtests Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_b.t line 28, near "is" (Missing semicolon on previous line?) syntax error at t/02_pragma_b.t line 27, near "; last" BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_b.t line 31. # Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything. t/02_pragma_b.t ......... Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Failed 6/6 subtests Semicolon seems to be missing at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112. syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 102, near "is" syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112, near "}" Execution of t/03_line_numbers.t aborted due to compilation errors. # Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything. t/03_line_numbers.t ..... Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) Failed 5/5 subtests A difference between passing and failing build root is at https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15176950. An update of perl-Lexical-Var from 0.009-31.fc38 to 0.010-1.fc39 is suspicious. Additional info: This package is tracked by Koschei. See: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301

1 18

[Bug 2028353] New: Request to update perl-CDB_File to 1.03 (or newer)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353 Bug ID: 2028353 Summary: Request to update perl-CDB_File to 1.03 (or newer) Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl-CDB_File Severity: high Assignee: mmckinst(a)umich.edu Reporter: fhirtz(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mmckinst(a)umich.edu, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Good morning, I'm working with someone who's running into a significant issue with an automation system that they use (quattor.org) due to a bug in the version of perl-CDB_File that's currently available in EPEL. The bug in question is: https://github.com/toddr/CDB_File/commit/9147df2c426b6ef8530fbc501e030168e1… This was addressed in version 1.03 and we were seeing if it might be possible to either include the patch as a backport, or more likely rebase to 1.03 (or newer)? Thank you! Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-CDB_File-1.02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353

1 3

[Bug 2037860] New: Please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Aug '24

05 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860 Bug ID: 2037860 Summary: Please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-HTML-Element-Extended Assignee: notting(a)splat.cc Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, notting(a)splat.cc, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Could you please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 9 ? If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and I'll do it myself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860

1 7

[Bug 1835353] New: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835353 Bug ID: 1835353 Summary: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com CC: akarol(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, bbuckingham(a)redhat.com, bcourt(a)redhat.com, bkearney(a)redhat.com, btotty(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com, dmetzger(a)redhat.com, gmccullo(a)redhat.com, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gtanzill(a)redhat.com, hhudgeon(a)redhat.com, jfrey(a)redhat.com, jhardy(a)redhat.com, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, lzap(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mmccune(a)redhat.com, nmoumoul(a)redhat.com, obarenbo(a)redhat.com, paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rchan(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rjerrido(a)redhat.com, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, roliveri(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, simaishi(a)redhat.com, smallamp(a)redhat.com, sokeeffe(a)redhat.com, tbrisker(a)redhat.com, tcallawa(a)redhat.com, vondruch(a)redhat.com, walter.pete(a)yandex.com, xavier(a)bachelot.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other A possible DoS issue may affect several MIME parsers. Messages with too many tiny nested MIME parts can lead to memory exhaustion on split(). References: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960064 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960062 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960159 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960158 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 1835355] New: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts [epel-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835355 Bug ID: 1835355 Summary: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts [epel-all] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Status: NEW Component: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of epel-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1830000] New: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI for EL7
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830000 Bug ID: 1830000 Summary: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI for EL7 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi, Could you please build perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI in EPEL 7 ? It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 7. Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1829995] New: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize for EL7
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829995 Bug ID: 1829995 Summary: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize for EL7 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize Assignee: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi, Could you please build perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize in EPEL 7 ? It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 7. Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 2037854] New: Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RC4 for EPEL 9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 06 Jun '24

06 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854 Bug ID: 2037854 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RC4 for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Crypt-RC4 Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: me(a)fale.io, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RC4 for EPEL 9. If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and I'll do it myself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854

1 6

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel May 2023