perl-devel September 2023

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
169 discussions

[Bug 2053941] New: The Fedora BuildRequires is missing an the license files are listed as %doc
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Dec '24

05 Dec '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053941 Bug ID: 2053941 Summary: The Fedora BuildRequires is missing an the license files are listed as %doc Product: Fedora Version: 34 Status: NEW Component: cpanspec Assignee: psabata(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugzilla(a)terrortux.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psabata(a)redhat.com, steve(a)silug.org, strobert(a)strobe.net Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: In the generated spec file, this line is missing: # needes by all perl packages BuildRequires: perl-generators perl-interpreter perl-devel perl And the license files of the generated spec file are marked as %doc instant of %license Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cpanspec-1.78-39.fc34.noarch How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Call cpanspec Sort::Versions for example Actual results: See above Expected results: Correct spec file Additional info: Also the old %setup macro is used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053941

1 12

[Bug 2218170] New: Please consider removing/porting aspell dependency. Aspell has been deprecated
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '24

27 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218170 Bug ID: 2218170 Summary: Please consider removing/porting aspell dependency. Aspell has been deprecated Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Text-Aspell Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com Reporter: ljavorsk(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2210277 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Aspell has been deprecated since Fedora 39. Please consider removing dependency on aspell, or porting it to the variants like hunspell or enchant/enchant2. Change proposal is located here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AspellDeprecation FESCo approval is located here: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3009 If your component has already removed/ported it's aspell dependency, or you don't Require/BuildRequire any aspell subpackage, feel free to close this Bugzilla. This Bugzilla was created automatically and some issues might have occurred along the way. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210277 [Bug 2210277] Deprecation of aspell package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218170 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2222637] New: F39FailsToInstall: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '24

27 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222637 Bug ID: 2222637 Summary: F39FailsToInstall: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2168845 (F39FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop) Fails To Install in Fedora 39: can't install perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop: - nothing provides perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.36.0) needed by perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc38.x86_64 If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-39-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168845 [Bug 2168845] Fedora 39 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222637 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 15

[Bug 2184301] New: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS: t/01_basic.t and 3more test fail
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '24

27 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301 Bug ID: 2184301 Summary: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS: t/01_basic.t and 3more test fail Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax- Feature-Loop Status: NEW Component: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Link ID: CPAN 147485 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Package perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop fails to build from source in Fedora Rawhide. Bareword found where operator expected at t/01_basic.t line 20, near "loop" (Missing semicolon on previous line?) syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 19, near "; last " Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20. Global symbol "$i" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $i"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20. Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20. Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 21. syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 22, near "}" Can't redeclare "my" in "my" at t/01_basic.t line 26, near "my" syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 28, near "last if" syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 36, near "}" syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 38, near "}" t/01_basic.t has too many errors. # Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything. t/01_basic.t ............ Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Failed 4/4 subtests Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_a.t line 28, near "is" (Missing semicolon on previous line?) syntax error at t/02_pragma_a.t line 27, near "; last" BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_a.t line 31. # Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything. t/02_pragma_a.t ......... Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Failed 6/6 subtests Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_b.t line 28, near "is" (Missing semicolon on previous line?) syntax error at t/02_pragma_b.t line 27, near "; last" BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_b.t line 31. # Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything. t/02_pragma_b.t ......... Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Failed 6/6 subtests Semicolon seems to be missing at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112. syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 102, near "is" syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112, near "}" Execution of t/03_line_numbers.t aborted due to compilation errors. # Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything. t/03_line_numbers.t ..... Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) Failed 5/5 subtests A difference between passing and failing build root is at https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15176950. An update of perl-Lexical-Var from 0.009-31.fc38 to 0.010-1.fc39 is suspicious. Additional info: This package is tracked by Koschei. See: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301

1 20

[rpms/perl-NetAddr-IP] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros
by Tom Stellard 04 Oct '24

04 Oct '24

tstellar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-NetAddr-IP` that you are following: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-NetAddr-IP/pull-request/1

2 4

[Bug 1803973] New: CGI::Session is missing in epel8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Sep '24

19 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803973 Bug ID: 1803973 Summary: CGI::Session is missing in epel8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-CGI-Session Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net Reporter: netwiz(a)crc.id.au QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The perl-CGI-Session package is not available for EPEL8. Please import & build for EPEL8. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 2232293] New: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.16-4.fc40 FTBFS: Failed test 't/data/tests/bailout'
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232293 Bug ID: 2232293 Summary: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.16-4.fc40 FTBFS: Failed test 't/data/tests/bailout' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-TAP-For matter-JUnit?collection=f40 Status: NEW Component: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Link ID: Github bleargh45/TAP-Formatter-JUnit/issues/15 Classification: Fedora perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.16-4.fc40 fails to build because a test fails: # Failed test 't/data/tests/bailout' # at t/formatter.t line 54. # During compare: # junk after document element at line 17, column 13, byte 381 # GOT: <testsuites> # <testsuite failures="0" # tests="5" # errors="0" # name="data_tests_bailout"> # <testcase name="1"></testcase> # <testcase name="2"></testcase> # <testcase name="3"></testcase> # <system-out><![CDATA[1..5 # ok 1 # ok 2 # ok 3 # Bail out! GERONIMMMOOOOOO!!! # ]]></system-out> # <system-err></system-err> # </testsuite> # </testsuites><testsuites> # <testsuite failures="0" # tests="5" # errors="0" # name="data_tests_bailout"> # <testcase name="1"></testcase> # <testcase name="2"></testcase> # <testcase name="3"></testcase> # <system-out></system-out> # <system-err></system-err> # </testsuite> # </testsuites> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 22. This is triggered by upgrading perl-Test-Harness from 1:3.44-501.fc39 to 1:3.46-1.fc40. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232293 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2028353] New: Request to update perl-CDB_File to 1.03 (or newer)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Aug '24

17 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353 Bug ID: 2028353 Summary: Request to update perl-CDB_File to 1.03 (or newer) Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl-CDB_File Severity: high Assignee: mmckinst(a)umich.edu Reporter: fhirtz(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mmckinst(a)umich.edu, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Good morning, I'm working with someone who's running into a significant issue with an automation system that they use (quattor.org) due to a bug in the version of perl-CDB_File that's currently available in EPEL. The bug in question is: https://github.com/toddr/CDB_File/commit/9147df2c426b6ef8530fbc501e030168e1… This was addressed in version 1.03 and we were seeing if it might be possible to either include the patch as a backport, or more likely rebase to 1.03 (or newer)? Thank you! Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-CDB_File-1.02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353

1 3

[Bug 2037860] New: Please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 06 Aug '24

06 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860 Bug ID: 2037860 Summary: Please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-HTML-Element-Extended Assignee: notting(a)splat.cc Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, notting(a)splat.cc, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Could you please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 9 ? If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and I'll do it myself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860

1 7

[Bug 1835353] New: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835353 Bug ID: 1835353 Summary: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com CC: akarol(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, bbuckingham(a)redhat.com, bcourt(a)redhat.com, bkearney(a)redhat.com, btotty(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com, dmetzger(a)redhat.com, gmccullo(a)redhat.com, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gtanzill(a)redhat.com, hhudgeon(a)redhat.com, jfrey(a)redhat.com, jhardy(a)redhat.com, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, lzap(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mmccune(a)redhat.com, nmoumoul(a)redhat.com, obarenbo(a)redhat.com, paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rchan(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rjerrido(a)redhat.com, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, roliveri(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, simaishi(a)redhat.com, smallamp(a)redhat.com, sokeeffe(a)redhat.com, tbrisker(a)redhat.com, tcallawa(a)redhat.com, vondruch(a)redhat.com, walter.pete(a)yandex.com, xavier(a)bachelot.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other A possible DoS issue may affect several MIME parsers. Messages with too many tiny nested MIME parts can lead to memory exhaustion on split(). References: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960064 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960062 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960159 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960158 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel September 2023