On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 15:38 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>> As this thing doesn't seem to be baked yet[1], and as I don't want to
>> see FE-6 and FE-5 being locked out from updates, for now, I will ignore
>> this issue on rawhide, i.e. you will likely see broken EVRs between
>> rawhide and older FE, on my perl-modules, soon.
>
> Why broken EVR's?
I should have been more explicit. I was referring to
EVR's between
different versions of Fedora. ATM, you'll see EVRs of some of my
perl-modules in FC6 carrying higher EVRs than that in rawhide.
Most perl module packages can use a common spec file across all
branches, except this is now broken in devel since perl-devel is needed
to build even noarch perl-based packages. So Ralf isn't updating perl
modules in devel until this is resolved,
Exactly, I do not want to change the 45+
perl-modules, I maintain,
before the outcome of this issue is clear (A one-time
change/mass-rebuild would be OK with me - once the outcome is clear)
with the result that updated
packages in branches for older releases have higher EVRs than the
equivalent packages in devel. I'm doing likewise for the moment.
Ralf