"Chris Weyl" <cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu> writes:
On 4/16/07, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:01 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
> > On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood <rnorwood(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Ok, that seems to be the consensus. We'll roll the split into F7, add
> > > the needed packages to the buildroots, and get the perl-* spec files
> > > fixed for F8. I'll get an email together to fedora devel list
> > > explaining the changes and asking for feedback. We should also update
> > > the perl packaging guidelines wiki page(s). Spot, I think you own those
> > > - do you want to make the change (perl packages should now BR perl-devel
> > > + co), or shall I?
> >
> > Wait -- I thought needing to BR perl-devel explicitly was something we
> > were trying to avoid (for portability, among other reasons). Have we
> > moved away from that?
>
> Well, not BR perl-devel, but BR the perl components your package
> actually need.
Ok, cool. I was hoping that was the case :)
Oh, yeah, sorry. What he said ^. :-)
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching