otaylor opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are following: `` Make builds for inclusion in an application Flatpak work ``
To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/1
otaylor commented on the pull-request: `Make builds for inclusion in an application Flatpak work` that you are following: `` It may be a little confusing: why do we need to handle mixed environements with some perl modules in /app and some in /usr? This is for build time in the buildroot of a Flatpak module (flatpak-common or an application module.)
BuildRequires might either be straight up Fedora packages, or they may be themselves rebuilds with prefix=/app. If a package BuildRequires: gcc, that can be a normal Fedora packages, but if it BuildRequires: libfontenc-devel, then that should be the libfontenc-devel from a rebuild libfontenc.
Perl is somewhere in the middle - generally when perl is being used to run automake, etc, it could be used just like gcc. But we *also* want to rebuild it so we can bundle it into an application RPM. Once we rebuild it, the rebuilt package will be used to satisfy BuildRequires:, so we need to make sure that we can have a mixed environment with some perl modules in /usr and some perl modules in /app. ``
To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/1
otaylor commented on the pull-request: `Make builds for inclusion in an application Flatpak work` that you are following: `` Closing in favor of #6 ``
To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/1
yselkowitz closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are following.
Closed pull-request:
`` Make builds for inclusion in an application Flatpak work ``
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org