golang September 2021

golang@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
8 discussions

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #2: EPEL availability
by Nicolas Mailhot 29 Mar '24

29 Mar '24

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` The macro code needs massaging to also work on EPEL. Most of the work is spec side since some of the macros are going to collide with the ones provided by previous iterations of Go macro packages `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/2

2 4

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #3: %goprep should apply patches automatically
by Nicolas Mailhot 29 Mar '24

29 Mar '24

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` `%goprep` should apply patches automatically, so there is no convenience gap with `%autosetup`. This is generic work that should be done *redhat-rpm-config* side in forge macros and then reused in`%goprep`. Basically: 1. define a `patch_flags<suffix>` rpm variable holding the parameters that should be passed to `%patch<suffix>` 2. define a `default_flags<suffix>` fallback 3. define a `source_patches<suffix>` holding an ordered space separated list of patch suffixes associated with a particular forge/go source. And then write the usual lua loops to apply it all at the right moment in the spec. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/3

6 9

[go-rpm-macros] PR #34: Add BUILDTAGS to %gobuildflags
by Brian C. Lane 21 Feb '23

21 Feb '23

bcl opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Add BUILDTAGS to %gobuildflags `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/34

7 19

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Go SIG
by jcajka＠fedoraproject.org 26 Sep '21

26 Sep '21

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Go SIG on 2021-09-27 from 20:00:00 to 21:00:00 Europe/Prague At fedora-golang(a)libera.chat The meeting will be about: Fedora's Go SIG meeting More information available at: [https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/](https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/) Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10012/

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Go SIG
by jcajka＠fedoraproject.org 12 Sep '21

12 Sep '21

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Go SIG on 2021-09-13 from 20:00:00 to 21:00:00 Europe/Prague At fedora-golang(a)libera.chat The meeting will be about: Fedora's Go SIG meeting More information available at: [https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/](https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/) Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10012/

1 0

Produced binary is an ar archive
by Mikel Olasagasti 05 Sep '21

05 Sep '21

Hi all, I'm new to Go SIG. There are some Go apps that I'm interested in packaging and I'm learning about it. One of these packages is `doctl`, the official cli for DigitalOcean, but I'm having problems with the result. I'm able to build it using mock or copr, but the generated binary is detected as `ar archive` by `file`, strip complains during %install phase and result rpm is not usable. - Spec file[1]: https://github.com/mikelolasagasti/doctl/blob/main/doctl.spec Simple go2rpm with minor changes. Requires also `golang-github-natefinch-pie` that is available in the same repo, rest of dependencies are available in rawhide and F35. - Copr build log[2]: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mikelo2/doctl/fedora-raw… (...) /usr/bin/strip: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/doctl-1.64.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/bin/doctl(__.PKGDEF): Unable to recognise the format of file: file format not recognized /usr/bin/strip: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/doctl-1.64.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/bin/doctl(_go_.o): Unable to recognise the format of file: file format not recognized (...) - rpmlint: $ rpmlint result/doctl-1.64.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm doctl.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/doctl doctl.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/bin/doctl doctl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary doctl - file: <mock-chroot> sh-5.1# cd /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/doctl-1.64.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/bin/ <mock-chroot> sh-5.1# file doctl doctl: I was able to find another spec[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821902 that is having the same issue, but not a solution. Any idea on how to troubleshoot this? Kind regards, Mikel [1] https://github.com/mikelolasagasti/doctl/blob/main/doctl.spec [2] https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mikelo2/doctl/fedora-raw… [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821902

2 2

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #32: Issues with gitea
by Robert-André Mauchin 05 Sep '21

05 Sep '21

eclipseo reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` When packaging: `code.gitea.io/tea` The goname is reduced to `golang-codeea-tea` Also the download link is wrong: it is resolved to `https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/archive/0.7.0.tar.gz` whereas it should be `https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/archive/v0.7.0.tar.gz` Can someone with knowledge of Lua regex fix this? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/32

2 5

[go-rpm-macros] PR #20: Use --with-tests when running checks also.
by Elliott Sales de Andrade 05 Sep '21

05 Sep '21

qulogic opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Use --with-tests when running checks also. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/20

1 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang September 2021