golang April 2020

golang@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
11 discussions

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #2: EPEL availability
by Nicolas Mailhot 29 Mar '24

29 Mar '24

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` The macro code needs massaging to also work on EPEL. Most of the work is spec side since some of the macros are going to collide with the ones provided by previous iterations of Go macro packages `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/2

2 4

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #3: %goprep should apply patches automatically
by Nicolas Mailhot 29 Mar '24

29 Mar '24

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` `%goprep` should apply patches automatically, so there is no convenience gap with `%autosetup`. This is generic work that should be done *redhat-rpm-config* side in forge macros and then reused in`%goprep`. Basically: 1. define a `patch_flags<suffix>` rpm variable holding the parameters that should be passed to `%patch<suffix>` 2. define a `default_flags<suffix>` fallback 3. define a `source_patches<suffix>` holding an ordered space separated list of patch suffixes associated with a particular forge/go source. And then write the usual lua loops to apply it all at the right moment in the spec. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/3

6 9

[go-rpm-macros] PR #20: Use --with-tests when running checks also.
by Elliott Sales de Andrade 05 Sep '21

05 Sep '21

qulogic opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Use --with-tests when running checks also. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/20

1 2

[go-rpm-macros] PR #23: macros: Accept options for %gotest
by Alexander Todorov 22 Jun '21

22 Jun '21

atodorov opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` macros: Accept options for %gotest `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/23

4 7

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #19: LDFlags Macro Typos
by Brian Exelbierd (bex) 20 Apr '21

20 Apr '21

bex reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` While working with a new package, I needed some LDFlags passed. I am using this construction in my spec: ``` %build LDFLAGS="-X foo=bar " %gobuild ... ``` I have to put the space in quotes at the end as we appear to have space expansion errors. I was talking to @ignatenkobrain and he pointed out: * https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/rpm/macros.d/macros.go-rpm#_3… there is a missing space * https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/rpm/macros.d/macros.go-compil… ${LDFLAGS:-%{?currentgoldflags}} ← should be like that `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/19

3 4

[go-rpm-macros] PR #21: Expose Go build flags directly to spec files as a macro
by Daniel P. Berrange 22 Oct '20

22 Oct '20

berrange opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Expose Go build flags directly to spec files as a macro `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/21

5 10

[go-rpm-macros] PR #24: Fix LDFLAGS macros typos
by Robert-André Mauchin 13 Aug '20

13 Aug '20

eclipseo opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Fix LDFLAGS macros typos `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/24

2 1

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Go SIG Meeting
by jcajka＠fedoraproject.org 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Go SIG Meeting on 2020-04-28 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 UTC At fedora-golang(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of Go SIG. For proposed agenda see the tagged tickets https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9344/

1 0

Requesting help to fix reg
by Mattia Verga 22 Apr '20

22 Apr '20

The `reg` package [1] is a Golang project needed by fedora-infra team. To prevent it from being retired due to FTB I've taken it [2], but I've found it's a real nightmare trying to fix it (I've got no experience at all with golang). Is there someone from Go SIG that can help with this? I think it will also need to be renamed to follow current packaging policies... it also seems to have a lot of bundled stuff. Mattia [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/reg [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapr…

2 2

Re-evalueting Go-SIG meeting slot/cadance
by Jakub Cajka 21 Apr '20

21 Apr '20

Hello, we have been talking about the fitness of current meeting slot in the recent past, especially in context of DTS shifts. I would like to start new poll to see if current slot, TZ peg and cadence is still working for us. Please fill this survey with your availability through out the week so we can select best slot. Please fellow up in this thread about on TZ(DTS) peg, cadence, if you want them to be changed. https://xoyondo.com/dp/Y9j5f0YpiF0a6fl For me I think that it would best to not have meeting based on UTC, but CEST TZ(and follow the DTS changes), cadence I think works fine. Looking forward to the results and feedback, JC

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang April 2020