golang December 2020

golang@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
13 discussions

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #2: EPEL availability
by Nicolas Mailhot 29 Mar '24

29 Mar '24

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` The macro code needs massaging to also work on EPEL. Most of the work is spec side since some of the macros are going to collide with the ones provided by previous iterations of Go macro packages `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/2

2 4

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #3: %goprep should apply patches automatically
by Nicolas Mailhot 29 Mar '24

29 Mar '24

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` `%goprep` should apply patches automatically, so there is no convenience gap with `%autosetup`. This is generic work that should be done *redhat-rpm-config* side in forge macros and then reused in`%goprep`. Basically: 1. define a `patch_flags<suffix>` rpm variable holding the parameters that should be passed to `%patch<suffix>` 2. define a `default_flags<suffix>` fallback 3. define a `source_patches<suffix>` holding an ordered space separated list of patch suffixes associated with a particular forge/go source. And then write the usual lua loops to apply it all at the right moment in the spec. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/3

6 9

[go-rpm-macros] PR #20: Use --with-tests when running checks also.
by Elliott Sales de Andrade 05 Sep '21

05 Sep '21

qulogic opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Use --with-tests when running checks also. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/20

1 2

[go-rpm-macros] PR #23: macros: Accept options for %gotest
by Alexander Todorov 22 Jun '21

22 Jun '21

atodorov opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` macros: Accept options for %gotest `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/23

4 7

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #25: Consider using -trimpath
by Debarshi Ray 26 Apr '21

26 Apr '21

rishi reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` See [this](https://github.com/containers/toolbox/pull/448) [Toolbox](https://github.com/containers/toolbox) discussion for context. It might be good to include `-trimpath` in `%gobuild` and `%gobuildflags`. Apparently Arch Linux already uses it. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/25

4 9

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #19: LDFlags Macro Typos
by Brian Exelbierd (bex) 21 Apr '21

21 Apr '21

bex reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` While working with a new package, I needed some LDFlags passed. I am using this construction in my spec: ``` %build LDFLAGS="-X foo=bar " %gobuild ... ``` I have to put the space in quotes at the end as we appear to have space expansion errors. I was talking to @ignatenkobrain and he pointed out: * https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/rpm/macros.d/macros.go-rpm#_3… there is a missing space * https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/rpm/macros.d/macros.go-compil… ${LDFLAGS:-%{?currentgoldflags}} ← should be like that `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/19

3 4

[go-rpm-macros] PR #26: Remove tildes from goname
by Benjamin Lowry 21 Apr '21

21 Apr '21

blowry opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Remove tildes from goname `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/26

6 13

Golang 1.16
by Robert-André Mauchin 24 Dec '20

24 Dec '20

Hello Jakub, I wanted to ask you at the meeting, how is the update to Golang 1.16 shaping up? Have you tested it on a small batch of packages? Should we expect breaking changes from upstream again? Best regards, Robert-André

2 3

Implementing Go modules in F34
by Robert-André Mauchin 22 Dec '20

22 Dec '20

Hi, Following the discussion we had at the meeting, it would be great if we had the new tooling in F34. As you may know, RHEL9 will be based off F34; we already missed the mark for RHEL8 which still doesn't support our current macros, so we have to bundle everything. I don't expect we will be able to rebuild our 1,600ish packages with Go modules for F34, so the changes would need to be **fully** backwards compatible, so we can target F35 without breaking F34. Nicolas, the issue is mostly in your hands, can we count on you to push for changes in redhat-rpm-config, package modist and update go-(s)rpm macros? We would need to move quickly as F34 is approaching. Are your current work on modules macros backward compatible without any changes to current packages? Best regards, Robert-André

2 1

Go modules are soon going to be the only future
by Robert-André Mauchin 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

See: https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/programming/GoModulesOnlyFuture I guess we'll need to switch too! I don't know if we're readyk Best regards, Robert-André

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang December 2020