Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
-- Leon
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
Yes. If you want expanded codec support, install the libavcodec-freeworld overlay package instead.
Am 19.11.23 um 14:30 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
Yes. If you want expanded codec support, install the libavcodec-freeworld overlay package instead.
Not sure what scenario is supported now. A common workstation setup has rpmfusion applications installed (ffmpeg, mpv, libavcodec-freeworld). Do I understand it correctly that I must remove ffmpeg-libs to install chromium now? Not sure if the new spec design with "Conflicts: ffmpeg-libs" has more a fedora context in mind. As both packages libavcodec-free and ffmpeg-libs provide the needed lib.
[root@ss ~]# LANG=C yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing Last metadata expiration check: 0:24:05 ago on Sun Nov 19 22:43:58 2023. Dependencies resolved.
Problem 1: package chromium-119.0.6045.159-1.el9.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-libs(x86-64) provided by ffmpeg-libs-5.1.3-1.el9.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package ffmpeg-libs-5.1.3-1.el9.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package chromium-119.0.6045.123-1.el9.x86_64 Problem 2: package libavdevice-5.1.3-1.el9.x86_64 requires ffmpeg-libs(x86-64) = 5.1.3-1.el9, but none of the providers can be installed - package chromium-119.0.6045.159-1.el9.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-libs(x86-64) provided by ffmpeg-libs-5.1.3-1.el9.x86_64 - problem with installed package chromium-119.0.6045.123-1.el9.x86_64 - package chromium-119.0.6045.123-1.el9.x86_64 requires chromium-common(x86-64) = 119.0.6045.123-1.el9, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both chromium-common-119.0.6045.159-1.el9.x86_64 and chromium-common-119.0.6045.123-1.el9.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libavdevice-5.1.3-1.el9.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package chromium-common-119.0.6045.123-1.el9.x86_64 ============================================================================================================================================================================= Package Architecture Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================================================================= Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): chromium x86_64 119.0.6045.159-1.el9 epel-testing 81 M chromium-common x86_64 119.0.6045.159-1.el9 epel-testing 13 M
Transaction Summary ============================================================================================================================================================================= Skip 2 Packages
Nothing to do. Complete! [root@ss ~]#
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 5:25 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Am 19.11.23 um 14:30 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
Yes. If you want expanded codec support, install the libavcodec-freeworld overlay package instead.
Not sure what scenario is supported now. A common workstation setup has rpmfusion applications installed (ffmpeg, mpv, libavcodec-freeworld). Do I understand it correctly that I must remove ffmpeg-libs to install chromium now? Not sure if the new spec design with "Conflicts: ffmpeg-libs" has more a fedora context in mind. As both packages libavcodec-free and ffmpeg-libs provide the needed lib.
Strictly speaking, from a Fedora context, RPM Fusion is not supported beyond limited cases. That said, EPEL has mpv itself too.
The "recommended" (as far as recommendations go when it comes to third party repositories) path is to use Fedora's ffmpeg-free stack and then install libavcodec-freeworld on top if there are codecs you are missing that you need. That package overlays a libavcodec build that includes things Fedora cannot ship at this time.
-- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
Am 20.11.23 um 01:38 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 5:25 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Am 19.11.23 um 14:30 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
Yes. If you want expanded codec support, install the libavcodec-freeworld overlay package instead.
Not sure what scenario is supported now. A common workstation setup has rpmfusion applications installed (ffmpeg, mpv, libavcodec-freeworld). Do I understand it correctly that I must remove ffmpeg-libs to install chromium now? Not sure if the new spec design with "Conflicts: ffmpeg-libs" has more a fedora context in mind. As both packages libavcodec-free and ffmpeg-libs provide the needed lib.
Strictly speaking, from a Fedora context, RPM Fusion is not supported beyond limited cases. That said, EPEL has mpv itself too.
The "recommended" (as far as recommendations go when it comes to third party repositories) path is to use Fedora's ffmpeg-free stack and then install libavcodec-freeworld on top if there are codecs you are missing that you need. That package overlays a libavcodec build that includes things Fedora cannot ship at this time.
Thanks Neal for the overview.
The specific issue was addressed now.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/c/cfac4f7e0f0cae0daffbbad5c4c82b...
Lets see when its in the repo.
-- Leon
Am 20.11.23 um 21:42 schrieb Leon Fauster:
Am 20.11.23 um 01:38 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 5:25 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Am 19.11.23 um 14:30 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
Yes. If you want expanded codec support, install the libavcodec-freeworld overlay package instead.
Not sure what scenario is supported now. A common workstation setup has rpmfusion applications installed (ffmpeg, mpv, libavcodec-freeworld). Do I understand it correctly that I must remove ffmpeg-libs to install chromium now? Not sure if the new spec design with "Conflicts: ffmpeg-libs" has more a fedora context in mind. As both packages libavcodec-free and ffmpeg-libs provide the needed lib.
Strictly speaking, from a Fedora context, RPM Fusion is not supported beyond limited cases. That said, EPEL has mpv itself too.
The "recommended" (as far as recommendations go when it comes to third party repositories) path is to use Fedora's ffmpeg-free stack and then install libavcodec-freeworld on top if there are codecs you are missing that you need. That package overlays a libavcodec build that includes things Fedora cannot ship at this time.
Thanks Neal for the overview.
The specific issue was addressed now.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/c/cfac4f7e0f0cae0daffbbad5c4c82b...
Lets see when its in the repo.
JFI - rpmfusion's packages can coexists now. With the full-fledged ffmpeg of rpmfusion the libavcodec-freeworld package is not needed. Thanks to @than the packager!
# LANG=C yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing --enablerepo=rpmfusion-free-updates-testing chromium Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:06 ago on Tue Nov 21 12:40:55 2023. Dependencies resolved. ======================================================================= Package Architecture Version Repository Size ======================================================================= Upgrading: chromium x86_64 119.0.6045.159-2.el9 epel-testing 81 M chromium-common x86_64 119.0.6045.159-2.el9 epel-testing 13 M ffmpeg x86_64 5.1.4-1.el9 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 1.7 M ffmpeg-libs x86_64 5.1.4-1.el9 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 7.8 M libavdevice x86_64 5.1.4-1.el9 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 72 k
Transaction Summary ======================================================================= Upgrade 5 Packages
-- Leon
Le lun. 20 nov. 2023 à 01:38, Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 5:25 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Am 19.11.23 um 14:30 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
Yes. If you want expanded codec support, install the libavcodec-freeworld overlay package instead.
Not sure what scenario is supported now. A common workstation setup has rpmfusion applications installed (ffmpeg, mpv, libavcodec-freeworld). Do I understand it correctly that I must remove ffmpeg-libs to install chromium now? Not sure if the new spec design with "Conflicts: ffmpeg-libs" has more a fedora context in mind. As both packages libavcodec-free and ffmpeg-libs provide the needed lib.
Strictly speaking, from a Fedora context, RPM Fusion is not supported beyond limited cases. That said, EPEL has mpv itself too.
@Neal Can you clarify why you Conflicts about ffmpeg-libs from rpmfusion whereas we have fixed the incompatibilities ? Please don't push breaking packages without the needed coordination notice, people aren't necessarily able to react at your own pace and this is perceived as tremendously aggressive !
@Adrew, there is a rpmfusion-free-updates-testing ffmpeg package that is compatible with the chromium newer releases. (for epel9) It will be pushed to stable ASAP.
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote:
Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
From a recent post to this list:
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 02:01:08 +0000 (UTC) From: updates@fedoraproject.org Reply-To: EPEL Development List epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To: epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: [EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report
... ... ...
============================================================================== chromium-119.0.6045.159-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03f6b44faf) A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser that Google doesn't want you to use
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update Information:
... ... ...
ChangeLog:
- Wed Nov 15 2023 Than Ngo than@redhat.com - 119.0.6045.159-1
- update to 119.0.6045.159, upstream security release High CVE-2023-5997, use after free in Garbage Collection High CVE-2023-6112, use after free in Navigation
- add Requires/Conflicts for ABI break in fmpeg-free 6.0.1
... ... ...
So it does look like an intentional, but needed, incompatability :-(
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Andrew C Aitchison -
Leon Fauster -
Neal Gompa -
Nicolas Chauvet