On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
On 10.09.2008 22:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 2008/9/10 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>:
>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:57:28 -0600
>> smooge(a)gmail.com ("Stephen John Smoogen") wrote:
>>> Our next scheduled meeting is Monday 2008-09-15 15:00 UTC. Please send
>>> me a list of topics we need to cover for our first meeting in a long
>>> while. We will be moving this to a weekly meeting so that various
>>> people with random schedules can meet at least 50% of the time.
Just a note: A lot of things IMHO can be done on the list. It's just each
"thing" needs someone to drive it forward. But that's the same on IRC as
Yes.. we should use the list first, and the IRC for our pings.
>> We need to address the packages in the testing repo that have
>> term broken dependencies. Either by removing them, warning then
>> removing them, or something.
> I am going to say:
> "warn to remove by Oct 15th. Remove on 16th"
In the interest of contributers, users and EPEL in general: I'd much prefer
if somebody would look at each of the problems and find a individual
solution for each of the problems. From looking at the broken deps it seems
to me that at least some of them are quite easy to fix. Some others otoh
might be quite hard to fix, so removing them really might be the better
solution for now.
And no, sorry, I'm not volunteering to do this. I'm quite busy with RPM
Fusion stuff right now :-/
No I understand.. we need to get a process in place.
1) Who makes fixes to fix low-hanging fruit
2) Who keeps track of things
3) When can we get this done by?
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"